America! Read About It

Censor in US Media....Who runs the US Media?

Alwyas I have seen many people, who think Ameican media are really free. They are not aware of all sort of manipulation and brain wash techniques that are being employed by these media to shape poples mind which is mostly in service of war mongers and starting wars all over the world with all kind of excuses.














About following article, in the last part there are some views which may be different or opposite to our views or believes, however it contains certain fact and statistics which is definitely very interesting for all of us, specially about the so called Free Media in US.


Controlling the News.. Parts 1, 2 & 3

Source: http://tbrnews.org/Archives/a294.htm

In-House Memos on Television News Presentations


            It has long been the strong belief of many Americans that their print and television media is subject to certain government oversight and, finally, control.


            Recently, a mid-level executive of one of the three major American television networks sent on over 1500 pages of memos from  the corporate offices of his network in New York to the head of their television news division.


            These memos contain a multitude of instructions concerning the presentation of national and international news for the network’s viewers. Corporate is obviously subject to the opinions of various pressure groups, to include those of official Washington and the Jewish community.


            It would be impossible to show all of these revealing documents but selections are certainly possible. What is not possible, obviously, is to reveal either the name of the conscience-stricken media executive nor the company that employs him. These comments, therefore, can be accepted or rejected by the reader as they see fit.


If the shoe fits, however, wear it.


(March 22):….it is not conducive to maintaining an overall neutrality in the Palestine uprisings to show any pictures of the American peacenik that was run over by the Israeli army bulldozer. This is only to be mentioned as a “tragic accident” for which the IDF “is truly saddened.”


(Feb 10)….It is not permitted at this point to use or refer to any film clips, stills or articles emanating from any French source whatsoever.


(Feb 26)    It is expected that coverage of the forthcoming Iraqi campaign will be identical with the coverage used during Desert Storm. Shots of GIs must show a mixed racial combination….any interviews must reflect the youthful and idealistic, not the cynical point of view…the liberation of happy, enthusiastic Iraqis can be best shown by filming crowds of cheering citizens waving American flags. Also indicated would be pictures of photogenic GIs fraternizing with Iraqi children and handing them food or other non-controversial presents…of course, pictures of dead US military personnel are not to be shown and pictures of dead Iraqi soldiers should not show examples of violent death…also indicated would be brief interviews with English-speaking Iraqi citizens praising American liberation effortsall such interviews must be vetted by either the White House or Pentagon before public airing.


(March 12) At this point in time, reference to North Korean military threats must be played down entirely. The Iraqi Freedom campaign has to be concluded in the public mind before proceeding with the next assault on the Evil Axis….


(March 26) US alliances with the Turkish/Iraqi Kurdish tribes should be played down. This is considered a very sensitive issue with the Turks and American arming and support of the Kurds could create a severe backlash in Ankara….Kurds should be depicted as Iraqi Freedom Fighters” and not identified as Kurds…


(March 2) further references to the religious views of the President are to be deleted…


(March 15) photo opportunities of the President and members of his cabinet, especially Secretary Rumsfeld, with enthusiastic GIs….


 


(March 19) No mention, repeat, no mention, of Palestinian suicide bombers during the Iraqi operation….


(March 25) …no mention of either Wolfowitz or Pearle should be made at the present time.


(March 10)….pro-Government rallies are to be given the fullest coverage…if anti-Government demonstrations are shown, it is desired to stress either a very small number of “eccentrics” or shots of social misfits; i.e., with beards, tattoos, physical deformities, etc. Pro-Government supporters should be seen as clean cut with as many well-groomed subjects as possible….subjects should stress complete support for the President’s programs and especially support for American military units en route to combat…also interviews with photogenic family members of participating GIs stressing loyalty and affection…American flags are always a good prop in the background…


(March 30) Friction between Secretary Rumsfeld and senior military field commanders in Iraq are to be strictly minimalized and used only when impossible to avoid….the Secretary’s point of view on all military matters is to be stressed….important to bring out his reputation as a “man who shakes things up” and a brilliant innovator.


(March 31) ….no discussion of high-level rumors about pre-emptive tactical nuclear strikes against North Korean missile, “hard” artillery positions opposite Seoul or key North Korean leadership or military commands is to be mentioned. It must be stressed that the North Korean situation is viewed as “serious but not critical” by unnamed “senior U.S. military leaders.”


(March 31) ….no mention of PRC strong objections to US pre-emptive actions against North Korea….a short summary of the President’s refusal to enter into any kind of negotiations” with the North Korean government….background report on the irrational and anti-democratic forces in North Korea…the desire of South Korea’s officials to maintain a close relationship with their American military protectors….no discussion of anti-US demonstrations in Seoul. These can be routinely dismissed as “radical students who are not supported by the new liberal and strongly pro-American President.”


April 4) …sharply rising unemployment numbers, this should be countered with official interviews stressing that the unemployment situation is now stabilizing and expected to fall soon.


(March 30) Because of the seriousness of the spread of SARS, actual figures of either the infected or of any deaths from local medical facilities must be carefully vetted via the CDC press information office in Atlanta. From the highest level, it is imperative that the American public not panic over the very rapid spread of this disease. Speculations of the actual nature of SARS is not under any circumstances to be permitted. Keep in mind the currently in- place rules following the outbreak of “Legionnaires Disease.”


(April 4) …a discussion of French desecrations of American and British war graves in France are to receive specific notice. Also, damage to the 9/11 memorial in Paris is to be included. No pictures of swastikas or other defamatory and anti-Administration graffiti are to be shown. French official apologies are permitted…..no comments equating the President with Hitler will be made….and the invasion of Iraq may not be compared with Hitler’s invasion of Poland, and such allegations now being made extensively in offshore media coverage are not to receive any attention. The Iraqi campaign is officially a campaign by a democratic United States against ruthless cruelty and oppression.


(April 5)…. comments appearing in the left-wing British Guardian about the occupation and administration of a conquered Iraq by American military personnel are to be ignored. Pacification, liberation, freedom and gratitude towards US forces, and the President are to be stressed.


(March 29) The President’s goal, to achieve oil autarchy by the United States, is suggested as a future series. Congressional denial of drilling in various environmentally “sensitive” areas may be derided as foolish misunderstanding of America’s vital oil needs. The interdiction of oil shipments to the United States from Venezuela and Nigeria are not to be commented upon. The attitude of Chavez towards the United States is also considered a non-topic. He was removed from power once and it can happen a second time. File footage of large crowds of distressed and unhappy Venezuelans should be prepared against the time he is removed from power again…


(April 4) If possible, pictures of the President with a book or, better, actually reading, are suggested. Commentary about his extensive reading habits…stress important historical and economic works…


(April 5) Presidential visits to military units in the United States are to receive full coverage and to extend past the usual slot time…spots of especially warm receptions are considered very important…


(April 7)    Please arrange for photo ops of President visiting wounded GIs….Use photogenic subjects w/good racial mix. Also try for pix of First Lady handing wounded subject a gift…President decorating wounded (in hospital bed) w medal(s) Make sure subject smiles at P. Warm handshakes (if possible.)


(April 7  ) …no shots of GIs looting in Baghdad. Iraqi looters should be described as “joyful” at being liberated by US. Looting to be described as a “deprived people getting food for families”…all pictures from forbidden French press sources  of a US  General’s staff car being filled with paintings and carpets to be blacklisted at Pentagon request. If such pixs show up on other networks, comment be made that General is “rescuing art treasures to preserve them for the Iraqi people.” Also Iraqi rioters could be shown waving in friendly way to GIs.


( April 4 ) Alliance casualties to be played down. The massive Iraqi civilian casualties also played down. Use the phrase, “most civilian casualties caused by vindictive Saddam supporters.” Again, no pixs of dead women and children.


(April 6 ) Artillery targeting of several mosques to be deleted…..


(April 2) … prepare a piece on the withdrawal of all US troops from S. Korea. Main theme: US pulling out to prevent N. Korea from attacking. Stress the pro-US stance of Noh and his firm support of the President and his goal of preventing N. Korean military adventurism…no mention of ongoing S. Korean anti-US riots. They are to be called “radical student demonstrations” but do not show clips unless it can be determined that the numbers shown are very small.


(Jan 21, 2002 )… in any article on Enron collapse, it is not considered advisable to discuss role of K. Lay. Charges against lesser Enron executives to be stressed. Lay’s extensive gifts to President to be limited to “small campaign contributions” and shift emphasis to large gifts to Ashcroft for his presidential campaign. Mention A’s recusal from Enron investigations…


(April 9 ) …play down the Moscow meetings w. Schroeder, Putin and French. Please, no mention of NATO problems…


(April 9 ) …concerning Moscow meetings, say Russia, Germany and France are willing to forgive their huge Iraqi debts at the direct request of President. Stress the need for Iraq to rebuild after years of repression and need to keep her funds “to help her people.”


(April 8 )develop possible linkage between Iraqi mobs and US need to police the country  for a “brief time” to prevent any attempt to stifle emerging democracy. Do not mention probability of continued large US military presence. Stress the words “restoring law and order” and “helping to make the transition to true democracy.”


(April 11)  US attack on Russian Ambassador’s convoy either to be ignored or blamed on “unknown Arab terrorists” who support Hussein. Considered expedient that if mention is made of attack, not to identify the country involved. This incident, officially termed a misunderstanding, is being cleared up with Russia now.


 ( April 7)… attacks on foreign media, often unfriendly to US,  to be explained as a “tragic error” and use the rationale of “pro-Saddam last ditch fanatics sniping at liberating US troops.” from areas attacked by US armor.


(April 13 ) SARS is now officially “under control” in the US. Air travel, in the US, has been cleared by CDC and other groups as “entirely safe.” Officially, there are no deaths from SARS in the United States. Use feed clips from CBC on “complete control” of disease in Canada… also mention lack of responsible reporting on subject by China.


(April 9 ) …in coverage of rebuilding of Iraq’s infrastructure, mention that American firms have expressed willingness to ”assist Iraq people to build a new, democratic nation.” No mention, by name, of Halliburton or Bechtel.


(April 10 ) show mention of restoration of Moscow statue of KGB founder…(linkage here) mention Putin’s former membership in KGB and very brief discussion of “growing pro-Stalinist” feelings in Russia. Consider this background for future series on same subject.


 


Editor’s Comments


            During the middle of March, 2003, tbrnews received an email from a man who claimed to be a mid-level executive with a major American television network. He stated in this, and subsequent, emails that he was in possession of “thousands” of pages of in-house memos sent from his corporate headquarters in New York City to the head of the network’s television news department. He went on to say that these memos set forth directives about what material was, and was not, to be aired on the various outlets of the network.


            This individual claimed he was developing serious doubts about the strict control of media events and decided that he would pass this material along to someone who might make use of it.


There was the question of his job security. If someone published his name, it would be certain he was not only fired but blackballed throughout his profession.


            If tbrnews would agree to protect his identity, he would send us these alleged thousands of pages of notes, going back to 2001.


            The proof of the pudding is in the eating so we accepted his caveats and he then sent to us by disk the pages he spoke of. All are on corporate stationary, signed or initialed by the senders and again, signed or initialed by the recipients in the news division.


            It was always possible that this material consisted of a very involved hoax or was something designed for the news site to use and then have it revealed that it was not original. It would not be the first time that spurious disinformation had been sent to us in the hopes that it would be used.


            There were not “thousands of pages” of memos but a total of 1,497 separate pages involved. Many of them consisted of short memos while others ran to a larger format.


            Naturally, someone could easily have obtained correct in-house network letterheads, made copies of them and prepared false memoranda but the sheer size and depth of the collection was impressive.


            If these memos were true, they showed with a terrible clarity that at least one part of the American mass media was strictly controlled and that the news was so doctored and spun that it might as well be official news releases from the White House and Pentagon.


            The best way in which to ascertain whether or not these documents contained original information was to check the dates of issuance and compare the information with subsequent news stories.


            This was a terrible, time-consuming chore but by selecting random memos and looking through the archives of various national newspapers, checking AP releases and so on, the results indicated that indeed, news was being managed.


            However, it was also possible that someone else did this and was preparing these after the fact and making the memos conform to published material.


            That having been said, we insisted on absolutely current memos so that we could then check these against future publications. If, for example, a corporate order was to show certain pictures or spin a story in a certain way, it would be relatively simple to simply read the press or watch television news to see if these suggestions were implemented.


            It was both shocking and gratifying to note that this proved to be the case and so we began to put these up, either in toto or, more often, in excerpt and watch as ordained news was created before our eyes.


            When a corporate order states, for instance, that certain pictures should be shown with accompanying commentary and the memo predates a published story by a week or more, then it is more than likely that the memos are not inspired guesswork but genuine.


            When tbrnews put up the first two pages, there were two forms of public response. One was to thank us for exposing something many people believed; that the American media was controlled and not free. (That much can easily be ascertained by reading the websites of various reputable foreign publications such as the Swiss NZZ, the British Guardian, the Canadian Toronto Globe and Mail, Reuters News Service and the Jerusalem Post. What any viewer can see on these sites is certainly not reflected in the American media.)


            The second response consisted of irate, and literate, statements that all of these  items were just stupid hoaxes and should not be believed. “I believe,” one writer who claimed to be a Professor of Journalism at an Ivy League college said, “these are just disinformation designed to discredit American journalists whose reputation for honesty and integrity is certainly beyond question. You are performing a great disservice in repeating these politically-motivated fictions…”


            This is certainly a true statement because if it became generally accepted that the American media was only a mechanical parrot for various political organization, it would no longer be either believed or watched. If viewers turned off their television sets, the networks would lose huge amounts of advertising revenue, reporters would be laid off and people would turn instead to the Internet for their news.


            Tbrnews receives many emails on a daily basis but the input on this subject has been so great that we have decided to expand the articles, irate journalists and professors to the contrary.


            In the final analysis, it is always up to the reader to make up their own mind as to the truth, or fiction, of what they read. The media has an opposite view of this.


            Shortly after this series began, we received the following article from a viewer.


            It is written to an idea and we are not in full agreement with many of the sentiments expressed by the writers but the salient facts stated therein are indisputable and easily verified and for this reason, we are printing it as a companion piece to this series of articles.


Who Rules America?


by the Research Staff of National Vanguard Books P.O. Box 330 · Hillsboro · West Virginia  24946 · USA


There is no greater power in the world today than that wielded by the manipulators of public opinion in America. No king or pope of old, no conquering general or high priest ever disposed of a power even remotely approaching that of the few dozen men who control America's mass media of news and entertainment.


Their power is not distant and impersonal; it reaches into every home in America, and it works its will during nearly every waking hour. It is the power that shapes and molds the mind of virtually every citizen, young or old, rich or poor, simple or sophisticated.


The mass media form for us our image of the world and then tell us what to think about that image. Essentially everything we know -- or think we know -- about events outside our own neighborhood or circle of acquaintances comes to us via our daily newspaper, our weekly news magazine, our radio, or our television.


It is not just the heavy-handed suppression of certain news stories from our newspapers or the blatant propagandizing of history-distorting TV "docudramas" that characterizes the opinion-manipulating techniques of the media masters. They exercise both subtlety and thoroughness in their management of the news and the entertainment that they present to us.


For example, the way in which the news is covered: which items are emphasized and which are played down; the reporter's choice of words, tone of voice, and facial expressions; the wording of headlines; the choice of illustrations -- all of these things subliminally and yet profoundly affect the way in which we interpret what we see or hear.


On top of this, of course, the columnists and editors remove any remaining doubt from our minds as to just what we are to think about it all. Employing carefully developed psychological techniques, they guide our thought and opinion so that we can be in tune with the "in" crowd, the "beautiful people," the "smart money." They let us know exactly what our attitudes should be toward various types of people and behavior by placing those people or that behavior in the context of a TV drama or situation comedy and having the other TV characters react in the Politically Correct way.


Molding American Minds


For example, a racially mixed couple will be respected, liked, and socially sought after by other characters, as will a "take charge" Black scholar or businessman, or a sensitive and talented homosexual, or a poor but honest and hardworking illegal alien from Mexico. On the other hand, a white person who looks askance at miscegenation or at the rapidly darkening racial situation in America -- is portrayed, at best, as a despicable bigot who is reviled by the other characters, or, at worst, as a dangerous psychopath who is fascinated by firearms and is a menace to all law-abiding citizens. The white racist "gun nut," in fact, has become a familiar stereotype on TV shows.


The average American, of whose daily life TV-watching takes such an unhealthy portion, distinguishes between these fictional situations and reality only with difficulty, if at all. He responds to the televised actions, statements, and attitudes of TV actors much as he does to his own peers in real life. For all too many Americans the real world has been replaced by the false reality of the TV environment, and it is to this false reality that his urge to conform responds. Thus, when a TV scriptwriter expresses approval of some ideas and actions through the TV characters for whom he is writing, and disapproval of others, he exerts a powerful pressure on millions of viewers toward conformity with his own views.


And as it is with TV entertainment, so it is also with the news, whether televised or printed. The insidious thing about this form of thought control is that even when we realize that entertainment or news is biased, the media masters still are able to manipulate most of us. This is because they not only slant what they present, but they establish tacit boundaries and ground rules for the permissible spectrum of opinion.


As an example, consider the media treatment of Middle East news. Some editors or commentators are slavishly pro-Israel in their every utterance, while others seem nearly neutral. No one, however, dares suggest that the U.S. government is backing the wrong side in the Arab-Jewish conflict and that it served Jewish interests, rather than American interests, to send U.S. forces to cripple Iraq, Israel's principal rival in the Middle East. Thus, a spectrum of permissible opinion, from pro-Israel to nearly neutral, is established.


Another example is the media treatment of racial issues in the United States. Some commentators seem almost dispassionate in reporting news of racial strife, while others are emotionally partisan -- with the partisanship always on the non-white side. All of the media spokesmen without exception, however, take the position that "multiculturalism" and racial mixing are here to stay, and that they are good things.


Because there are differences in degree, however, most Americans fail to realize that they are being manipulated. Even the citizen who complains about "managed news" falls into the trap of thinking that because he is presented with an apparent spectrum of opinion he can escape the thought controllers' influence by believing the editor or commentator of his choice. It's a "heads I win, tails you lose" situation. Every point on the permissible spectrum of public opinion is acceptable to the media masters -- and no impermissible fact or viewpoint is allowed any exposure at all, if they can prevent it.


The control of the opinion-molding media is nearly monolithic. All of the controlled media -- television, radio, newspapers, magazines, books, motion pictures -- speak with a single voice, each reinforcing the other. Despite the appearance of variety, there is no real dissent, no alternative source of facts or ideas accessible to the great mass of people that might allow them to form opinions at odds with those of the media masters. They are presented with a single view of the world -- a world in which every voice proclaims the equality of the races, the inerrant nature of the Jewish "Holocaust" tale, the wickedness of attempting to halt the flood of Latino aliens pouring across our borders, the danger of permitting citizens to keep and bear arms, the moral equivalence of all sexual orientations, and the desirability of a "pluralistic," cosmopolitan society rather than a homogeneous one. It is a view of the world designed by the media masters to suit their own ends -- and the pressure to conform to that view is overwhelming. People adapt their opinions to it, vote in accord with it, and shape their lives to fit it.


And who are these all-powerful masters of the media? As we shall see, to a very large extent they are Jews. It isn't simply a matter of the media being controlled by profit-hungry capitalists, some of whom happen to be Jews. If that were the case, the ethnicity of the media masters would reflect, at least approximately, the ratio of rich gentiles to rich Jews. Despite a few prominent exceptions, the preponderance of Jews in the media is so overwhelming that we are obliged to assume that it is due to more than mere happenstance.


Electronic News & Entertainment Media


Continuing government deregulation of the telecommunications industry has resulted, not in the touted increased competition, but rather in an accelerating wave of corporate mergers and acquisitions that have produced a handful of multi-billion-dollar media conglomerates. The largest of these conglomerates are rapidly growing even bigger by consuming their competition, almost tripling in size during the 1990s. Whenever you watch television, whether from a local broadcasting station or via cable or a satellite dish; whenever you see a feature film in a theater or at home; whenever you listen to the radio or to recorded music; whenever you read a newspaper, book, or magazine -- it is very likely that the information or entertainment you receive was produced and/or distributed by one of these megamedia companies.


AOL-TW.


The largest media conglomerate today is AOL-Time Warner, created when America Online bought Time Warner for $160 billion in 2000. The merger brought together Steve Case, a White gentile, as chairman of AOL-TW, and Gerald Levin, a Jew, as the CEO. A brief history of the company is in order.


The four (gentile) Warner brothers founded their movie company in 1907 and had their first major success ten years later with My 4 Years in Germany. WB incorporated in 1923 and went on to cartoon success with Porky Pig and Bugs Bunny. In 1948, WB sold its film library to MGM. In 1949, another court ruling forced WB to sell its cinema chain, obstructing vertical integration by a single movie-making company, while doing nothing to prevent the Jews from establishing such integration through an ethnic collaboration.


In 1958, WB created Warner Brothers Records, which was later renamed WEA. In 1968, Jack Warner sold his shares to Seven Arts, while DC and All-American Comics were bought by Kinney National Services (a funeral parlor conglomerate). Kinney turned around and bought a talent agency, then turned around again and bought Warner-Seven Arts, becoming Warner Communications.


Warner Communications bought Elektra Records in 1970, the same year that David Geffen, a Jew, started the Asylum label. (The name is synonymous with crazy-house.) Time bought HBO from Charles Dolan in 1972. Ironically, 1972 was also the year when Money magazine began publication, while the (original) magazine Life ceased.


Ted Turner entered the major media scene in 1976 when his TV station WTCG (Atlanta) was carried on US cable networks. In 1979, Turner Communications Group became Turner Broadcasting System, and WTCG was renamed WTBS. The following year, CNN became the world's first 24-hour all-news cable network. Turner tried to buy CBS in 1985, but he was blocked when Lawrence Tisch, a Jew, bought 25% of shares. Instead, Turner bought MGM's film library (1986). TBS merged with Castle Rock and New Line Cinema in 1994. In 1996, Turner made a career-busting faux pas by selling TBS to Time Warner. AOL bought Time Warner in 2000.


In 2001, Gerald Levin, who had been Chairman of Time Warner and then CEO of the merged AOL-TW, fired Ted Turner from his position during a telephone conversation. Control of TBS temporarily shifted to Robert Pittman but was given shortly afterward to Walter Isaacson, a Jew, who was recruited from his former position at Time Inc., to take over the company that Ted Turner built. We're reasonably certain that Ted Turner would not have sold TBS to Time Warner if he'd known that Levin was going to fire him only five years later. Levin smooth-talked Turner in classic Jewish fashion, and Turner, having placed his trust in a Jew's honor, paid the price for that mistake.


But Levin wasn't finished with his dagger. Having backstabbed Turner, he did likewise to his other useful dupe, Robert Pittman. Pittman had been Levin's champion for the AOL-TW merger on the AOL side. While we don't know for certain what Pittman's motive was, we could guess that it had something to do with Pittman believing himself to be Levin's choice as the new CEO at AOL-TW after Levin's retirement. But when the time came to finalize his choice of successor, Levin bypassed Pittman and gave the position to his long-time pet mulatto, Richard Parsons. Parsons has been AOL-TW's CEO since May 2002. Pittman, though initially grumpy about this treatment, has moderated his tone. A paycheck less than Parsons' paycheck is still better than no paycheck at all.


Before the merger, AOL was the largest Internet service provider in America, and it is now being used as an online platform for the Jewish content from Time Warner. Time Warner, with 1997 revenues of more than $13 billion, was the second largest of the international media leviathans when it was bought by AOL.


Time Warner's subsidiary HBO is the country's largest pay-TV cable network. Until the purchase in May 1998 of PolyGram by Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Warner Music was America's largest record company, with 50 labels, the biggest of which is Warner Brothers Records (WEA). Warner Music was an early promoter of "gangsta rap." Through its involvement with Interscope Records (prior to Interscope's acquisition by MCA), it helped to popularize a genre whose graphic lyrics explicitly encourage Blacks to commit acts of violence against Whites.


AOL-TW's publishing ventures include Time-Life International Books, Time-Life Education, Time-Life Music, Time-Life AudioBooks, Book-of-the-Month Club (both adult and children's branches), Paperback Book Club, History Book Club, Money Book Club, HomeStyle Books, Crafter's Choice, One Spirit, Little Brown, Bulfinch Press, Back Bay Books, Warner Books, Warner Vision, The Mysterious Press, Warner Aspect, Warner Treasures, Oxmoor House, Leisure Arts, Sunset Books and TW Kids.


AOL-TW owns the following cable and satellite companies, among others: Cinemax, Time Warner Sports, HBO (7 US and 6 international divisions), CNN (10 divisions worldwide), Time Warner Cable, Road Runner, Time Warner Communications (primarily a telephone service), New York City Cable Group, New York 1 (a sort of CNN devoted exclusively to news in the NYC area), Time Warner Home Theater, Time Warner Security (video monitoring), Court-TV (ownership shared with Liberty Media), Comedy Central (ownership shared with Viacom) and Kablevision (Hungary).


AOL-TW owns the following TV and movie companies: Warner Brothers, WB studios, WB Television (Productions, Animation, and Network), Hanna-Barbera Cartoons, Telepictures Production, Witt-Thomas Productions, Castle Rock Entertainment, Warner Home Video, WB Domestic Pay-TV, WB Domestic TV Distribution, WB International TV Distribution, The Warner Channel (separate companies for Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Australia, and Germany), and WB International Theaters in 12 countries.


The editor-in-chief of Time Warner's publishing division is Norman Pearlstine. AOL-TW owns the following magazines: Time, Time Asia, Time Atlantic, Time Canada, Time Latin America, Time South Pacific, Time Money, Time For Kids, Fortune, Life (the watered-down new version), Sports Illustrated (plus SI Women/Sport, SI International, and SI For Kids), Inside Stuff, Money, Your Company, Your Future, People, Who Weekly (Australia), People en Español, Teen People, Entertainment Weekly, EW Metro, The Ticket, In Style, Southern Living, Progressive Farmer, Southern Accents, Cooking Light, Travel Leisure, Food & Wine, Your Company, Departures, SkyGuide, Vertigo, Paradox, Milestone, Mad Magazine, Parenting, Baby Talk, Baby on the Way, This Old House, Sunset, Sunset Garden Guide, Health, Hippocrates, Costal Living, Weight Watchers, Real Simple, President (Japan), and Dancyu (Japan). AOL-TW owns 80 additional magazines (mostly hobby and leisure) in Britain.


AOL-TW holds the following music record labels: Atlantic Group, Atlantic Classics, Atlantic Jazz, Atlantic Nashville, Atlantic Theater, Big Beat, Background, Breaking, Curb, Igloo, Lava, Mesa/Bluemoon, Modern, Rhino Records, Elektra, EastWest, Asylum, Elektra/Sire, Warner Brothers Records, Warner Nashville, Warner Alliance, Warner Resound, Warner Sunset, Reprise, Reprise Nashville, American Recordings, Giant, Maverick, Revolution, Qwest, Warner Music International, WEA Telegram, East West ZTT, Coalition, CGD East West, China, Continental, DRO East West, Erato, Fazer, Finlandia, MCM, Nonesuch, and Teldec.


Disney.


The second-largest media conglomerate today, with 1997 revenues of $23 billion, is the Walt Disney Company. Its chairman and CEO, Michael Eisner, is a Jew. The Disney empire, headed by a man described by one media analyst as "a control freak," includes several television production companies (Walt Disney Television, Touchstone Television, Buena Vista Television) and cable networks with more than 100 million subscribers altogether. The TV stations under Disney control include: WLS (Chicago), WJRT (Flint), KFSN (Fresno), KTRK (Houston), KABC (Los Angeles), WABC (New York City), WPVI (Philadelphia), WTVD (Raleigh), KGO (San Francisco) and WTVG (Toledo).


Disney also has a major presence in radio, owning WKHX, WYAY and WDWD in Atlanta; WMVP, WLS, and WXCD in Chicago; WBAP and KSCS in Dallas; WDRQ, WJR and WPLT in Detroit; KLOS and KTZN in Los Angeles; KQRS, KXXR, KDIZ, KZNR, and KZNT in St. Paul; WPLJ in New York City; KSFO in San Francisco; WMAL, WJZW, and WRQX in Washington; and ESPN Radio.


As for feature films, the Walt Disney Motion Pictures Group, under Walt Disney Studios, headed by Joseph E. Roth (also a Jew), includes Walt Disney Pictures, Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, and Caravan Pictures. Roth founded Caravan Pictures in January 1993, and it is now headed by co-religionist Roger Birnbaum. Disney also owns Miramax Films, run by the Weinstein brothers, Bob and Harvey, who have produced such ultra-raunchy movies as The Crying Game, Priest, and Kids.


When the Disney Company was run by the gentile Disney family, prior to its takeover by Eisner in 1984, it epitomized wholesome, family entertainment. While it still holds the rights to Snow White, the company under Eisner has expanded into the production of a great deal of so-called "adult" material.


In August 1995, Eisner acquired Capital Cities/ABC, Inc., which owns the ABC Television Network, which in turn owns ten TV stations outright in such big markets as New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston. In addition, it has 225 affiliated stations in the United States and is part owner of several European TV companies.


ABC's cable subsidiary, ESPN, is headed by president and CEO Steven Bornstein. The corporation also has a controlling share of Lifetime Television and A & E Television Networks cable companies, with 67 million subscribers each. ABC Radio Network owns 26 AM and FM stations, again in major cities such as New York, Washington, and Los Angeles, and has over 3,400 affiliates.


Although primarily a telecommunications company, Capital Cities/ABC earned over $1 billion in publishing in 1997. Besides these publishing concerns, Disney owns Walt Disney Company Book Publishing, Hyperion Books, and Miramax Books. It also owns six daily newspapers, including the Albany Democrat and the St. Louis Daily Record.


Disney's magazine titles include Automotive Industries, Biography (partial ownership), Discover, Disney Adventures, Disney Magazine, ECN News, ESPN Magazine, Family Fun, Family PC, Institutional Investor, Jane, JCK, Kentucky Prairie Farmer, Kodin, Los Angeles, Multichannel News, Penny Power, Talk, Top Famille (France), Video Business, and Quality.


Disney operates 660 retail stores worldwide (the figure is for April 2000). And, incidentally, it is also invested in crude oil and natural gas exploitation.


On the Internet, Disney runs Buena Vista Internet Group, ABC Internet Group, ABC.com, ABCNEWS.com, Oscar.com, Mr. Showbiz, Disney Online, Disney's Daily Blast, Disney.com, Family.com, ESPN Internet Group, ESPN.sportzone.com, Soccernet.com, NFL.com, NBA.com, Infoseek (partial ownership), and Disney Interactive.


Viacom.


Number three on the list, with 1997 revenues of just over $13 billion, is Viacom, Inc., headed by Sumner Redstone (born Murray Rothstein). Viacom was formed in 1971 as a way to dodge an anti-monopoly FCC ruling that required CBS to spin off a part of its cable TV operations and syndicated programming business. This move by the government unfortunately did nothing to reduce the mostly Jewish collaborative monopoly that remains the major problem with the industry. In 1999, after CBS had again augmented itself by buying King World Productions (a leading TV program syndicator), Viacom acquired its progenitor company, CBS, in a double mockery of the spirit of the 1971 ruling.


Viacom produces and distributes TV programs for the three largest networks, owns 13 television stations and 12 radio stations. It produces feature films through Paramount Pictures, headed by Jewess Sherry Lansing. Redstone acquired CBS following the December 1999 stockholders' votes at CBS and Viacom.


Working for Redstone as CBS's chief executive is a Jew named Melvin A. Karmazin. He is the boss and biggest individual shareholder of the company that owns the CBS Television Network, 14 major-market TV stations, 160 radio stations, the Country Music Television and the Nashville Network cable channels, and a large number of outdoor advertising assets.


Viacom's publishing division includes Simon & Schuster, Scribner, The Free Press, Fireside, Archway Paperbacks and Minstrel Books, Anne Schwartz Books, MTV Books, Nickelodeon Books, Pocket Books, and Washington Square Press. It distributes videos through over 4,000 Blockbuster stores (including the Video Flicks chain in Australia). It is also involved in satellite broadcasting, theme parks, and video games.


Viacom's chief claim to fame, however, is as the world's largest provider of cable programming, through its Showtime, MTV, Nickelodeon, and other networks. Since 1989 MTV and Nickelodeon have acquired larger and larger shares of the juvenile television audience. The first quarter of 2001 was the 16th consecutive quarter in which MTV was rated as the #1 cable network for viewers between the ages of 12 and 24. Redstone, who actually owns 76 per cent of the shares of Viacom, has offered Beavis and Butthead as teen role models and currently is the largest single purveyor of race-mixing propaganda to White teenagers and sub-teens in America and in Europe. MTV Networks acquired The Music Factory (TMF) from the Dutch media and marketing group Wegener in 2001. TMF distributes music to almost 10 million homes in Holland and Belgium. MTV is expanding its presence in Europe through new channels, including MTV Dance (Britain) and MTV Live (Scandinavia). MTV Italy is active through Cecchi Gori Communications. MTV pumps its racially mixed rock and rap videos into 210 million homes in 71 countries and is the dominant cultural influence on teenagers around the world.


Nickelodeon, with about 65 million subscribers, has by far the largest share of the four-to-11-year-old TV audience in America and also is expanding rapidly into Europe. Most of its shows do not yet display the blatant degeneracy that is MTV's trademark, but Redstone is gradually nudging the fare presented to his kiddie viewers toward the same poison purveyed by MTV. As of early 2001, Nickelodeon was continuing a nine-year streak as the top cable network for children and younger teenagers.


Viacom operates two major motion picture enterprises jointly with Vivendi Universal (detailed hereafter): United Cinemas International (UCI) and United International Pictures (UIP).


Vivendi Universal.


Another Jewish media mogul is Edgar Bronfman, Jr. He headed Seagram Company, Ltd., the liquor giant, until its recent merger with Vivendi. His father, Edgar Bronfman, Sr., is president of the World Jewish Congress. Seagram owned Universal Studios and Interscope Records, the foremost promoter of "gangsta rap." These companies now belong to Vivendi Universal.


Bronfman became the biggest man in the record business in May 1998 when he also acquired control of PolyGram, the European record giant, by paying $10.6 billion to the Dutch electronics manufacturer Philips. With the revenue from PolyGram added to that from MCA and Universal, Bronfman became master of the fourth largest media empire, with annual revenues around $12 billion. One especially unfortunate aspect of the PolyGram acquisition was that it gave Bronfman control of the world's largest producer of classical music CDs: PolyGram owns the Deutsche Grammophon, Decca-London, and Philips record companies.


In June 2000, the Bronfman family sold Seagram to Vivendi, a French utilities company formerly led by gentile Jean-Marie Messier. The combined company, Vivendi Universal, retains Edgar Bronfman, Jr., as the vice chairman of the new company, and he will continue to be in charge of its entertainment division. As with the AOL-TW merger, the strategy seemed to be infect and wait. The debt Vivendi incurred by buying Universal was used to scandalize Messier, who had to resign. Jean-René Fourtou became the Chairman/CEO of Vivendi on 3 July 2002. Subsequently, to pay off its debts, Vivendi-Universal began selling assets, beginning with Seagam's alcohol business, but later selling some of its media holdings, including its Houghlin-Mifflin publishing company (educational textbooks), which had been acquired in June 2001, to a consortium formed by Thomas H. Lee Partners, Blackstone Group, Bain Capital and Apax Partners.


Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation, which owns Fox Television Network, 20th Century Fox Films, and Fox 2000, is the fifth largest megamedia corporation in the country, with 1997 revenues of over $11 billion. It is the only other media company which comes even close to the top four. Murdoch is a gentile (so far as we know), but Peter Chernin, who is president and CEO of Fox Group, which includes all of News Corporation's film, television, and publishing operations in the United States, is a Jew. Under Chernin, as president of 20th Century Fox, is Laura Ziskin, a Jewess who formerly headed Fox 2000. Peter Roth works under Chernin as president of Fox Entertainment. News Corporation also owns the New York Post and TV Guide, and they are published under Chernin's supervision. Murdoch told Newsweek magazine (July 12, 1999) that he would probably elevate Chernin to CEO of News Corporation, rather than allow the company to fall into the hands of his own children, none of whom are younger than their late twenties. It is hard to imagine a Jew giving a major media corporation to a gentile underling when he has children waiting in the wings. For his part, Chernin was quite candid: "I get to control movies seen all over the world. . . . What could be more fun?"


Most of the television and movie production companies that are not owned by the largest corporations are also controlled by Jews. For example, New World Entertainment, proclaimed by one media analyst as "the premier independent TV program producer in the United States," is owned by Ronald Perelman, who also owns Revlon Cosmetics and who offered a job to Monica Lewinsky when Bill Clinton was trying to keep her quiet.


The best known of the smaller media companies, DreamWorks SKG, is a strictly kosher affair. DreamWorks was formed in 1994 amid great media hype by recording industry mogul David Geffen, former Disney Pictures chairman Jeffrey Katzenberg, and film director Steven Spielberg, all three of whom are Jews. The company produces movies, animated films, television programs, and recorded music. Considering the cash and connections that Geffen, Katzenberg, and Spielberg have, DreamWorks may soon be in the same league as the big four.


It is well known that Jews have controlled most of the production and distribution of films since shortly after the inception of the movie industry in the early decades of the 20th century. When Walt Disney died in 1966, the last barrier to the total Jewish domination of Hollywood was gone, and Jews were able to grab ownership of the company that Walt built. Since then they have had everything their way in the movie industry.


Films produced by just the four largest motion picture companies mentioned above -- Disney, Warner Brothers, Paramount (Viacom), and Universal (Seagram) -- accounted for two-thirds of the total box-office receipts for the year 1997.


The big three in television network broadcasting used to be ABC, CBS, and NBC. With the consolidation of the media empires, these three are no longer independent entities. While they were independent, however, each was controlled by a Jew since its inception: ABC by Leonard Goldenson; NBC first by David Sarnoff and then by his son Robert; and CBS first by William Paley and then by Laurence Tisch


The executives at NBC recently were shuffled among the key positions. Andrew Lack, who had been chief of the network's news division, ascended to become its president and chief operations officer. Neal Shapiro, who had been producing Dateline NBC, moved into Lack's old job. Jeff Zucker, who had been producing the Today show, was promoted to NBC entertainment president (a job that apparently was created for him), and Jonathan Wald moved into Zucker's old spot after shoving aside Michael Bass, who had been filling in for Zucker with Today. Some time ago, Wald became the producer of the NBC Nightly News, taking the position from Jeff Gralnick. When Wald moved to Today, Steve Capus took over as Tom Brokaw's producer. It is not known at this time whether Capus is a Jew or not, but everyone else is.


A similar preponderance of Jews exists in the news divisions of the other networks. For example, in February 2000, Al Ortiz moved to head the "Special Events" coverage at CBS, making gentile Jim Murphy the executive producer of The CBS Evening News with Dan Rather -- and the only exception that we know of to an otherwise solidly Jewish cadre of television news producers. The new CBS Early Show, which replaced CBS This Morning, had an internal shakeup in which three producers were fired, ostensibly for not being "aggressive" enough. One wonders whether they were also not Jewish enough. The shakeup did not, however, affect the outgoing executive producer Al Berman, who transferred to a new job as a program developer, and Steve Friedman has become the executive producer of the Early Show.


Paul Friedman is still the executive producer of ABC World News Tonight with Peter Jennings. Rick Kaplan, once an executive at ABC, moved to CNN in 1997, where he became the president of CNN/USA.


The Print Media


After television news, daily newspapers are the most influential information medium in America. Sixty million of them are sold (and presumably read) each day. These millions are divided among some 1483 different publications (this figure is for February 2000). One might conclude that the sheer number of different newspapers across America would provide a safeguard against minority control and distortion. Alas, such is not the case. There is less independence, less competition, and much less representation of majority interests than a casual observer would think.


In 1945, four out of five American newspapers were independently owned and published by local people with close ties to their communities. Those days, however, are gone. Most of the independent newspapers were bought out or driven out of business by the mid-1970s. Today most "local" newspapers are owned by a rather small number of large companies controlled by executives who live and work hundreds or even thousands of miles away. Today less than 20 percent of the country's 1483 papers are independently owned; the rest belong to multi-newspaper chains. Only 104 of the total number have circulations of more than 100,000. Only a handful are large enough to maintain independent reporting staffs outside their own communities; the rest must depend on these few for all of their national and international news.


The Associated Press, which sells content to newspapers, is currently under the control of its Jewish managing editor, Michael Silverman, who directs the day-to-day news reporting and supervises the editorial departments. Silverman had directed the AP's national news as assistant managing editor since 1992. He was promoted to his current job in 2000. Silverman reports to Jonathan Wolman, also a Jew, who is executive editor for the AP.


(Comment: Nearly all the news disseminated in the United States today, be it wire copy to newspapers or television, comes in the main from the AP. It controls and is the bottleneck through which all news passes and he who controls the AP controls America’s news. Large newspapers such as the New York Times have their own correspondents in Washington and throughout the world buy many smaller papers and television stations have to rely on the AP for national and international news.)


In only 47 cities in America are there more than one daily newspaper, and competition is frequently nominal even among them, as between morning and afternoon editions under the same ownership. Examples of this are the Mobile, Alabama, morning Register and afternoon Press-Register; and the Syracuse, New York, morning Post-Standard and afternoon Herald-Journal -- all owned by the Jewish Newhouse brothers through their holding company, Advance Publications.


The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than the lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers: it also illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all the organs of opinion control on which they could fasten their grip. The Newhouses own 30 daily newspapers, including several large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the country's largest cable networks; the Sunday supplement Parade, with a circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle, Glamour, Vanity Fair, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self, House & Garden, and all the other magazines of the wholly owned Conde Nast group.


This Jewish media empire was founded by the late Samuel Newhouse, an immigrant from Russia. When he died in 1979 at the age of 84, he bequeathed media holdings worth an estimated $1.3 billion to his two sons, Samuel and Donald. With a number of further acquisitions, the net worth of Advance Publications has grown to more than $8 billion today.


The gobbling up of so many newspapers by the Newhouse family was in large degree made possible by the fact that newspapers are not supported by their subscribers, but by their advertisers. It is advertising revenue -- not the small change collected from a newspaper's readers -- that largely pays the editor's salary and yields the owner's profit.


Whenever the large advertisers in a city choose to favor one newspaper over another with their business, the favored newspaper will flourish while its competitor dies. Since the beginning of the last century, when Jewish mercantile power in America became a dominant economic force, there has been a steady rise in the number of American newspapers in Jewish hands, accompanied by a steady decline in the number of competing gentile newspapers -- primarily as a result of selective advertising policies by Jewish merchants.


Furthermore, even those newspapers still under gentile ownership and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising revenue that their editorial and news reporting policies are largely constrained by Jewish likes and dislikes. It holds true in the newspaper business as elsewhere that he who pays the piper calls the tune.


Major American Newspapers


The suppression of competition and the establishment of local monopolies on the dissemination of news and opinion have characterized the rise of Jewish control over America's newspapers. The resulting ability of the Jews to use the press as an unopposed instrument of Jewish policy could hardly be better illustrated than by the examples of the nation's three most prestigious and influential newspapers: the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington Post. These three, dominating America's financial and political capitals, are the newspapers that set the trends and the guidelines for nearly all the others. They are the ones that decide what is news and what isn't, at the national and international levels. They originate the news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in Jewish hands.


The New York Times, with a September 1999 circulation of 1,086,000, is the unofficial social, fashion, entertainment, political, and cultural guide of the nation. It tells America's "smart set" which books to buy and which films to see; which opinions are in style at the moment; which politicians, educators, spiritual leaders, artists, and businessmen are the real comers. And for a few decades in the 19th century it was a genuinely American newspaper.


The New York Times was founded in 1851 by two gentiles, Henry J. Raymond and George Jones. After their deaths, it was purchased in 1896 from Jones's estate by a wealthy Jewish publisher, Adolph Ochs. His great-great-grandson, Arthur Sulzberger, Jr., is the paper's current publisher and the chairman of the New York Times Co. The executive editor is Joseph Lelyveld, also a Jew (he is a rabbi's son).


The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June 1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McCall's and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.


Of similar national importance is the Washington Post, which, by establishing its "leaks" throughout government agencies in Washington, has an inside track on news involving the Federal government.


The Washington Post, like the New York Times, had a non-Jewish origin. It was established in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins, purchased from him in 1905 by John R. McLean, and later inherited by Edward B. McLean. In June 1933, however, at the height of the Great Depression, the newspaper was forced into bankruptcy. It was purchased at a bankruptcy auction by Eugene Meyer, a Jewish financier and former partner of the infamous Bernard Baruch, industry czar in America during the First World War. The Washington Post was run by Katherine Meyer Graham, Eugene Meyer's daughter, until her death in 2001. She was the principal stockholder and the board chairman of the Washington Post Co. and appointed her son, Donald Graham, publisher of the paper in 1979. Donald became Washington Post Company CEO in 1991 and its board chairman in 1993, and the chain of Jewish control at the Washington Post remains unbroken. The newspaper has a daily circulation of 763,000, and its Sunday edition sells 1.1 million copies.


The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers (the Gazette Newspapers, including 11 military publications); in television (WDIV in Detroit, KPRC in Houston, WPLG in Miami, WKMG in Orlando, KSAT in San Antonio, WJXT in Jacksonville); and in magazines, most notably the nation's number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Washington Post Company's various television ventures reach a total of about 7 million homes, and its cable TV service, Cable One, has 635,000 subscribers.


In a joint venture with the New York Times, the Post publishes the International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English-language daily in the world.


The Wall Street Journal, which sells 1.8 million copies each weekday, is the nation's largest-circulation daily newspaper. It is owned by Dow Jones & Company, Inc., a New York corporation that also publishes 24 other daily newspapers and the weekly financial tabloid Barron's, among other things. The chairman and CEO of Dow Jones is Peter R. Kann, who is a Jew. Kann also holds the posts of chairman and publisher of the Wall Street Journal.


Most of New York's other major newspapers are in no better hands than the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. In January 1993 the New York Daily News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish media mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm. And, as mentioned above, the New York Post is owned by News Corporation under the Jew Peter Chernin.


News Magazines


The story is pretty much the same for other media as it is for television, radio, films, music, and newspapers. Consider, for example, newsmagazines. There are only three of any importance published in the United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report.


Time, with a weekly circulation of 4.1 million, is published by a subsidiary of Time Warner Communications, the new media conglomerate formed by the 1989 merger of Time, Inc., with Warner Communications. Although Gerald Levin has retired, Time Warner Communications is still essentially Jewish in character.


Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington Post Company, under the Jew Donald Graham. Its weekly circulation is 3.1 million.


U.S. News & World Report, with a weekly circulation of 2.2 million, is owned and published by the aforementioned Mortimer B. Zuckerman, who also has taken the position of editor-in-chief of the magazine for himself. Zuckerman also owns the Atlantic Monthly and New York's tabloid newspaper, the Daily News, which is the sixth-largest paper in the country.


Our Responsibility


Those are the facts of media control in America. Anyone willing to spend a few hours in a large library looking into current editions of yearbooks on the radio and television industries and into directories of newspapers and magazines; into registers of corporations and their officers, such as those published by Standard and Poors and by Dun and Bradstreet; and into standard biographical reference works can verify their accuracy.


Jewish media control determines the foreign policy of the United States and permits Jewish interests rather than American interests to decide questions of war and peace. Without Jewish media control, there would have been no Persian Gulf war, for example. There would have been no NATO massacre of Serb civilians. There would be no continued beating of the drums for another war against Iraq.


By permitting the Jews to control our news and entertainment media we are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children, whose attitudes and ideas are shaped more by Jewish television and Jewish films than by parents, schools, or any other influence.


Owners, managers, and corporate relationships change from time to time, of course. All of the names and other data in this report have been checked carefully and are accurate as of December, 2002.

+ Me ; ۱٢:٥٩ ‎ب.ظ ; شنبه ۳٠ فروردین ،۱۳۸٢
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

 

Demons Of Necessity: 

Why Weapons of Mass Destruction Will be Found




By: Lisa Walsh
Thomas
- 03/30/03


 





"We Americans are the ultimate innocents. We are forever desperate to believe that this time the government is telling us the truth."
- Sidney Schanberg (columnist)



 


Under a large rock in the deserts of Iraq, lie the weapons of mass destruction that threaten "freedom." They are there somewhere, now or later, and they WILL be found. 



History authored the notion that necessity is the mother of invention. History is also the diary in which is recorded that necessity sometimes, or perhaps often, spawns the great demons of so-called civilization. 



Adolph Hitler gained a strong foothold in the control of Germany when he achieved the chancellorship in 1933. That wasn't enough to allow him to implement his grand plan, however, which required convincing the German people to give him control over the military. For such extreme trust from the people, there needed to be a threat beyond the danger of putting such power into the hands of one man. Such a threat was a NECESSITY for him to achieve full dictatorial powers. 



On the night of February 27th, just after Hitler became chancellor, the Reichstag caught fire and burned to the ground. 



Within the hour, Hitler's S.A. picked up a mentally ill (probably schizophrenic) man named Marinus van der Lubbe. Van der Lubbe, under
"questioning," confessed to starting multiple fires using the underground tunnels beneath the Reichstag. He was accused of having done so as a representative of the German communists, whom Hitler feared and hated. The German people were incensed that the communists-turned-terrorists had attacked them right in the jugular. Der Lubbe was executed and few people asked why there were no police or other security people guarding the Reichstag that night. 



Communist (KPG) leaders were arrested and Hitler was granted the dictatorial powers he had sought. Most of us know what followed. 



This is not to suggest that a deranged lone man did not successfully burn the Reichstag to the ground on a night when no one was looking. It is to suggest only that necessity perhaps dictated what happened. 



In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson desperately wished to send more troops to Vietnam, in a full-scale escalation of the non-declared war, but neither the people nor the congress felt any justification for such escalation. 



Then, on August 4, on nationwide television, Johnson declared that North Vietnamese torpedo boats had launched an
"unprovoked attack" against a U.S. destroyer on "routine
patrol
" in the Tonkin Gulf. Further, Johnson and the Pentagon told the American public that North Vietnamese PT boats followed up with a "deliberate attack" on a pair of U.S. ships. 



The accusations turned out to be fabrications. The U.S. destroyer Maddox was actually engaged in aggressive intelligence-gathering maneuvers -- in sync with coordinated attacks on North Vietnam by the South Vietnamese navy and the Laotian air force. But the lies were NECESSARY in order to produce support for Johnson's plans. 



The now-famous Gulf of Tonkin Resolution - the closest thing there ever was to a declaration of war against North Vietnam -- sailed through Congress on August 7, with a vote of 88 to 2, the votes based on the now-accepted deception. 



The deception had been NECESSARY. In the end, it was costly, especially to the more than 50,000 American soldiers who died in the jungle and the millions of Vietnamese they killed. Nevertheless, it was at its inception, in the minds of some, necessary. 



In 1997 the rightwing thinktank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC), dealing with permanent hegemony of the United States, was formed. Finding the U.S. as a sole superpower with financial surpluses unheard of since the 60s, there, just waiting to happen, was a pax americana, a U.S. imperialism to control the world. 



The vast cost of setting such imperialistic aims in motion necessitated a belief by the American people that they were in danger that could be averted by an even larger military machine, one which would by chance be financially beneficial to many prominent people in the U.S. government. 



What was needed for America to dominate much of humanity and the world's resources, the PNAC crowd said, was
"some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." This, according to John Pilger in The New Statesman, was written in advance of 9-11. 



A terrorist strike on American soil, the likes of which had never before been envisioned, was necessary. 



On September 11, 2001, that strike came when a handful of Saudi hijackers (according to accepted conclusions) with some boxcutters flew two planes into the World Trade Center and another into the Pentagon, opportunely for them, at a time when the U.S. Air Force trained to intercept such actions on any other day had fallen asleep at the wheel. 



Americans woke up, shocked, heartbroken, and ready for battle. The administration could have whatever it wanted. Congress gave Mr. Bush carte blanche, making him the most powerful chief executive in American history. To refuse him ANYTHING was considered almost treasonous. A former Honduran ambassador accused by the Honduran Human Rights Commission of aiding in death squad activity was able to slide right through as Mr. Bush's choice for U.N. ambassador. 



A heinous act had been perpetrated upon the American people, and no one could object to any demand made by the new Commander-in-Chief. To place our full trust in him, regarding military matters, tax cuts, and anything else imaginable, was NECESSARY. 



There were skeptics about the sudden jump to conclusions. The administration and hundreds of thousands of
flagwavers blindly agreed to obliterate Afghanistan if it meant they might find the perpetrator of this act. All evidence pointed to Osama bin Laden, a man created by the CIA during the cold war. Mr. Bush, despite family and business ties between the Bush and the Saudi bin Laden families, vowed to find Osama,
"dead or alive.



Coincidentally, the previous May, Colin Powell had delivered 43 million dollars to the Taliban who controlled Afghanistan. It was an old story of their having something we wanted and our having something they wanted. The Caspian oil reserves at that time were projected to be one of the largest in the world, and western oil companies were working late into the night to decide who the oil belonged to and how it could be transferred from the former Soviet bloc countries to the sea. France already had a deal going to ship its share via a proposed pipeline in Iran. The U.S. had no place to put a pipeline. Afghanistan was the logical choice, and bartering began. 



During all this business-as-usual, many of us all over the world were trying to draw attention to the inhumane treatment of women by Afghanistan's Taliban. Our outrage was ignored. The pipeline was of greater importance, and relations couldn't be strained as long as the U.S. was dependent upon the Taliban to build this pipeline. 



Then the Taliban balked and wouldn't cooperate. As has happened so often in the past century, you cross Uncle Sam and you get to wear a black hat. 



The sequence of events is not that confusing. Attempts were made to buy off pipeline rights with the Taliban. The Taliban refused. The World Trade Center was attacked. The alleged ringleader, Osama bin Laden, was hiding out in Afghanistan. 



So, mostly from six miles up, the U.S. attacked and conquered Afghanistan, easy pickings in a destitute, war-ravaged third-world country. The lesson of Vietnam had been to attack only when certain of victory, i.e. a focus on weak or defenseless countries. 



The two most wanted men, Osama and his son-in-law, Mullah Omar, were not found. In an ironic twist, the Caspian oil reserves now appear to be less fertile than originally calculated. Still, it had been NECESSARY to send Afghanistan further into the Stone Age because Osama was probably hiding out there in a cave with his dialysis machine. 



Necessity justified the attack, the destruction of unborn lives through depleted uranium, and a civilian death toll we don't yet have straight. As for the failure to find Osama, the administration patiently explained to us that the issue wasn't "a single man." Osama is already in the process of being forgotten. It is not NECESSARY to find him. 



Afghanistan was practice. Since long before 9-ll, many eyes had been on Iraq. Not only does Iraq have the second largest oil reserves
(and considering sulfur content, the richest) on earth but many consider it a perfect foothold for control of the entire mideast. 



We began to be told that the REAL danger to our nation and its allies lay in Iraq, with its weapons of mass destruction, which were to have been destroyed at the close of Gulf War I. 



Inspectors had searched for these weapons for several years before leaving the country to avoid Clinton's bombings in 1998.
(Contrary to popular myth, they were never "thrown out" of Iraq.) The U.S. demanded retribution for Iraq's alleged failure to comply with the U.N.'s resolution calling for the destruction of the weapons, while Iraq insisted it no longer had such weapons. 



The U.N. insisted that the next step was to send the inspectors back. The inspectors returned, given full access to the entire country. While they sometimes found Iraqi officials difficult to work with, in the end chief weapons inspector Hans Blix stated unequivocally that the inspectors had found not one piece of evidence of weapons of mass destructions. 



There were some red herrings, but each was shot down by the International Atomic Energy Commission or the U.N. Over a hundred al-Samoud 2 missiles, all declared by Iraq, were found to overshoot their allowed distance by ninety kilometers. Despite Iraq's insistence that the extra range resulted from empty payloads, they began to be destroyed, unavailable for defense should the Anglo-American forces decide to unilaterally invade anyway. 



If WMD existed in Iraq, they were out of the reach of the inspectors. And the U.S. was eager to get the inspectors out so that the invasion could begin before the climate became too hot for soldiers unused to the desert. World opinion was growing against the Anglo-American position, and there was no time to be lost. 



The American people allowed the genocide now taking place in Iraq for two reasons: 



1. In a bewildering show of ignorance, the people could not keep Osama and Saddam straight, believing that it was Saddam who attacked the world trade center. Not even Bush claimed this, but few at the top explained to the people that Saddam and Osama are mortal enemies. The people wanted revenge for the 3,000 deaths in New York City, and they went for the wrong man. 



2. From sea to shining sea, the majority of the American people believed Saddam had/has weapons of mass destruction. A frenzy allowed people to pass on such untenable fears as,
"If we don't take his nukes from him, he can wipe out New York City whenever he
wants.
" The corporate press fed this fear daily. 



Most of the U.N. and the International Atomic Energy Commission and millions and millions of people opposing this invasion knew that there probably WERE no weapons of mass destruction. The "evidence" was all paper-tiger quality, shot down as it was discovered to be fabrications, some of it embarrassingly so. The evidence that all former WMD
(Saddam had in the past been provided some by Britain and the U.S., had even used some of their chemicals on the rebelling
Kurds
) no longer existed was much stronger. Most of the world concluded that however much a thug Saddam Hussein might be, it had no bearing on whether he posed a danger to anyone outside his own country. 



But the "coalition" (armed by three countries - the U.S., Britain, and
Australia
) has now invaded a sovereign country against the wishes of the U.N., the EU, NATO, the world's religious leaders, and the majority of the people on earth. American and British servicepeople have died. Iraqi civilians have died. More will die. Dozens of mothers in the United States are weeping. Thousands of mothers in Iraq are weeping. 



The only thing that will "justify" these deaths is the discovery of vast amounts of dangerous weapons of mass destruction. It is NECESSARY, vitally necessary, to those who orchestrated the current happenings, that these weapons be found and shown to the world as evidence of Bush/Blair rightness. It is essential in allowing the U.S. to save any face left to be saved. 



So they WILL be found. 



And millions of people, those with yard signs that say, "Iraq today, France
tomorrow
," those who still confuse Iran and Iraq, those who don't know the difference between Osama and Saddam, those who believe Bush has a serious connect with God, those who think the nineteen alleged hijackers on 9-11 were Iraqis
(documentation shows them to be primarily Saudi), all these people will trust their leaders that these weapons were there all along. 



This is how it happens. This is what necessity does in the hands of ruthless men. This is how the fine fabric of goodness turns to frayed gossamer, then rotted remnants of dirty threads. This is how a land of compassion, integrity and courage can become the most hated nation on earth. 



It sleeps with Necessity. It snuggles close. It either blindly believes or it does whatever it has to do to win the prize. It lets its once-pure face be stroked by the seductive, gnarled hands of power and greed, complacency and ignorance. It joins either the Germans who turned their heads when the trains rolled by or it joins those who used cattle prods to pack dissidents into the cars. 



There is no in-between. Of all the spawn of this necessary seduction, Ignorance is the most unforgivable. 



The touted weapons of mass destruction WILL be found. They will be found because it is NECESSARY that they be found.


 




Lisa Walsh Thomas
is a former journalist, sixties activist, poet and contributing political writer
to Liberal Slant, Practical Radical, Online Journal, and
www.AmericaHeldHostile.com 
She has a column, "The Raven's Nest" at:
http://practicalradical.net/raven.html 
and is the founder of "Mad Grandparents.
saavedra1979@yahoo.com 


 


Sources: 



http://www.newamericancentury.org/  



http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf  



"The War Within: America's Battle Over Vietnam," by Tom Wells 



"Uncensored War," by Daniel Hallin



http://www.pvhs.chico.k12.ca.us/~bsilva/projects/germany/3rdreich/default.htm


 


Find more articles by
Lisa Walsh Thomas

in the
Liberal
Slant Archives



Back to: Liberal
Slant


 


The
views expressed herein are the writers' own

and do not necessarily reflect those of Liberal Slant


www.liberalslant.com


2003-2002-2001-2000-1999-1998

LIBERALSLANT
Web
Publications.

All rights reserved.


liberalslant@entermail.net


+ Me ; ۱٢:۱٦ ‎ب.ظ ; سه‌شنبه ۱٢ فروردین ،۱۳۸٢
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

Their real target

God almighty in holy Quran says: “They desire to put out the light of Allah with their mouths, but Allah will perfect His light, though the unbelievers may be averse.”


Wednesday, Jan 8, 2003 10:15 a.m. EST
Hackworth: Iran Is the Real U.S. Target

Revenge against Iran, the terrorist state and arch-malefactor in the Axis of Evil, is the ultimate goal of our Middle East strategy, says Col. David Hackworth.


Ostensibly, all of the hubbub in Iraq is intended to get rid of Saddam Hussein, the dictator whose ruthlessness and crimes against humanity are well documented.


But Hackworth, the highly decorated soldier, war correspondent and author, says in his most recent column: "Iraq, with its elusive bio/chem weapons and maybe some nuke hardware 'misplaced by the Soviets,' is by far the easiest of the Axis of Evil rogue nations to put down.


"Of the three nations on the Axis of Evil list, 'Iran is the hardest and the toughest military and social adversary,' reports a spook friend who knows where the bodies are buried because he helped put them there.


"But, as he puts it, 'Once we've neutralized Iraq, we'll have completed the encirclement of Iran.'


"With Iran surrounded, it'll be payback time for Hezbollah and the other terrorist horrors this vicious outlaw state has launched and supported from 1979 until today."


So, what about North Korea, and why are we treating them with diplomatic kid gloves?


Hackworth does not spare the rod on this subject, either. He thinks that the opportunity to get back at Iran, and perhaps install another U.S.-backed shah, are reason enough for "Rummy and his oil-obsessed chicken hawks ... to play nuclear poker and treat North Korea as a sideshow regardless of the hard-to-hide facts: its nukes, long-range missiles, tons of bio/chem stuff and a million hardcore fanatics now leaning forward in their foxholes readying to banzai south."


Source: http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2003/1/8/102931
+ Me ; ۱٢:۱۸ ‎ق.ظ ; جمعه ٢٠ دی ،۱۳۸۱
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

Axis of Oil?

Axis of Oil?

"Even more ironic is that the real WWII Axis powers - Nazi Germany, Italy and Japan - had a major strategic problem in common. Unlike GW's Axis of Evil, none had oil reserves, a prerequisite for world domination. Getting access to oil was part of their reason for invading other countries. Bush is doing exactly what they were doing in WWII, creating a justification for war, threatening war and then invading..."


by Robert Lederman
robert.lederman@worldnet.att.net
http://baltech.org/lederman

"States like these [Iran, Iraq and North Korea], and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world." GW Bush, State of the Union address 1/29/2002 The leaders of many nations are scoffing at GW Bush's Axis of Evil comment in his State of the Union speech. Among their complaints is that Iraq, Iran
and North Korea have little in common, share no agreement on joining an axis of anything and in the case of Iran and Iraq are each other's worst enemies.

But was GW actually correct in lumping them together? Have the uninitiated missed the profound geopolitical wisdom of the man CNN's talking heads have begun to call, "the greatest American President''?

There is one very important issue tying North Korea, Iran and Iraq together. Oil.

The slippery black gold is very dear to GW's heart and to the corporate sponsors of his administration like David Rockefeller and Enron, which Rockefeller's Chase Bank disastrously financed. The three nations Bush elevated to the status of "evil" just happen to be competitors of the Saudi Arabian oil fields that the Bush and Rockefeller families have been aligned with for the past 70 years.

Outside of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq and the offshore oil fields of North Korea, the other main source of oil for the future is in the former Soviet Republics. For those oil and gas deposits to become an economically viable source for the West a huge pipeline has to be built through Afghanistan - exactly what Enron and the Bush administration were negotiating with the Taliban before 9/11.

If the U.S. can't gain peaceful control over these nations' oil wealth, an invasion or overthrow of their governments will do the trick. To justify such an invasion Bush just needs the right excuse, such as an unending, "war on terrorism".

Within each of these countries are factions and individuals -many of them with CIA training and/or funding - who will gladly stir up a little revolution when ordered to do so - or launch a terrorist attack. Then we can send in the bombers to "defend democracy".

Contrary to the impression Bush has conveyed to the American public Afghanistan as a nation did not attack the U.S. and was actually peacefully negotiating an oil deal with U.S. corporations before 9/11. Although none of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were from Afghanistan, 15 of the 19 and bin Laden himself are from our great ally in the war against terrorism, Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabia massively funds terrorists and is as anti-American as a nation can get yet it's not part of Bush's Axis of Evil. Maybe that's because the Saudi royal family and the bin Laden family are long-time business partners with the Bush family.

If as Bush claims we are focusing on Iran, Iraq and north Korea because they sell weapons and fund terrorists then why aren't we threatening England, France, Germany, Russia...and ourselves? The U.S. is the world's largest seller of weapons, has by far the largest biological and chemical weapons program and is the only nation that has ever used nuclear weapons. The U.S. finances terrorists like bin Laden all over the world and like Sadamn Hussein, we've used biological and chemical weapons against our own
population.

We also lead all other nations in funding terrorists. It was William Casey, founder of the eugenics-centered Manhattan Institute, who as CIA director in the Reagan/Bush administration built up Islamic fundamentalism in Afghanistan by supplying bin Laden and friends with billions of dollars in weapons, training and aid. If Al Qaida actually was behind the 9/11 attack, we can thank Bill Casey for giving them the know-how to bring it off.

Calling Iran, Iraq and North Korea, "uncivilized" as GW did in his address is somewhat ironic since they each existed as high cultures thousands of years before the U.S. became a nation. According to historians, six thousand years ago the area of the world we know as Iran and Iraq was the birthplace of what we euphemistically call Western civilization.

It's also considered the homeland of the so-called Aryan race. Perhaps GW just wants to reclaim der fatherland.

Korean culture is likewise thousands of years old and was highly developed when Europe was in the Dark Ages. It might come as quite a shock to Koreans to find that our semi-literate pretzel-munching leader thinks they are uncivilized.

Even more ironic is that the real WWII Axis powers - Nazi Germany, Italy and Japan - had a major strategic problem in common. Unlike GW's Axis of Evil, none had oil reserves, a prerequisite for world domination. Getting access to oil was part of their reason for invading other countries. Bush is doing exactly what they were doing in WWII, creating a justification for war, threatening war and then invading.

While the three regimes Bush has announced he may invade next are among the world's least sympathetic, one thing is certain. Unlike the minimal military resistance the Taliban presented us with, these three nations have huge armies and advanced weapons, which in the case of Iraq, include biological and chemical weapons.

We know for a certainty Iraq has these weapons because the former Bush administration and many of the present Bush administration's cabinet appointees such as Dick Cheney enriched themselves by supplying Sadamn Hussein with them.

There is an ultimate irony about Bush's Axis of Evil quote.

It was Bush's grandfather, Prescott Bush and Prescott's father in law George Herbert Walker (GW's namesake) who made their initial fortune on Wall Street supplying Nazi Germany and the other Axis nations with money, steel, ships, munitions, formulas for synthetic gas and other materials vital to creating their armies. In 1942 the U.S. Congress seized the Bush families' banking assets as Nazi fronts under the Trading With the Enemy Act.

In a very literal sense, GW is a frontman for the real Axis of Evil, the corporate terrorists who are busily enslaving mankind while genetically manipulating and polluting the entire world. Compared to them, Iran, Iraq and North Korea are bit players who can only aspire to one day achieve the levels of evil that have been the hallmark of the Bush family and their circle of corporate eugenicists for the past century.

The following quotes illustrate the facts in this essay.

NORTH KOREA
North Korea's Upcoming Oil Boom http://www.kimsoft.com/1997/nk-oil3.htm

http://www.korea-np.co.jp/pk/072nd_issue/98120202.htm "North Korea has an
estimated reserve of 155 million tons (12 million barrels) in offshore oil fields in its Western sea area, a south Korean monthly magazine reported. "North Korea has five oil deposit zones in the Western sea, 150 km off the Nampo seashore, South Pyongan Province," it said. The monthly Shin Dong-A quoted a Korean-American expert as saying, "It has five zones in the area; 65 million tons in the first zone, 50 million tons in the second zone, 30 million tons in the third zone, a small amount of oil in the fourth zone, and 10 million tons in the fifth zone."

http://www.korea-np.co.jp/pk/019th_issue/97112701.htm "N. Korean Oil Projects Emerge as Realistic Issue By Mun Ho Il Special to The People's Korea "The Canada-based KANTEK Company estimates in its materials declassified on Sept. 25 that the north Korean oil reserves in District No. 606 of the Korean West Sea continental shelf reach about five to 40 billion barrels. The south Korean vernacular daily Hanguk Ilbo on Sep. 29 reported the U.S.-based Stanton Group is eager to invest in an oil project as a
KEDO-style consortium member."

http://www.korea-np.co.jp/pk/026th_issue/98011403.htm "After 30 years of geological study and test drilling, the Ministry of Petroleum Industry concluded in its recent survey that there are eight oil-bearing basins in the DPRK. They are the Pyongyang Basin, West Sea Bay Basin, East Sea Bay Basin, Onchon Basin (Nampo), Kyongson Bay Basin (Chonjin), Anju Basin (South Pyongan Province) and Kilju Basin (North Hamgyong Province). The report suggests that the West Sea Bay and Anju Basins are promising among them, and figures out that the West Sea Bay Basin contains about 5 to 40 billion
barrels of oil."

IRAN
This is from the U.S. Department of Energy
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/iran.html "Iran Iran is OPEC's second largest oil producer and holds 9% of the world's oil reserves and 15% of its gas reserves. Additionally, Iran is a focal point for regional security issues. "

NY Times March 29, 2000
Fearing Loss of Market Share, Iran Increases Oil Production "VIENNA, March 29 -- Just hours after Iran angrily broke ranks with all other members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, its leaders sent oil prices down today by announcing that they would, after all, increase their production in line with the rest of the group. "We are going to take our market share," Iran's OPEC governor, Hossein Kazempour Ardebili, said in an interview. "We are going to keep and preserve our market share. Beyond that,
we will see what will happen."..."This would be serious if you had large excesses in capacity," said Irene King, senior oil economist at J.P.Morgan & Co. in New York."

http://www.sanibrite.ca/iran/oil.html
"It has been estimated that Iran is sitting on 83 -85 Billion (thousand
millions) barrels oil. It means one eleventh (1/11) of world oil."

Iran history and people
http://www.sanibrite.ca/iran/ "About 6,500 Years ago, successive waves of people were migrating into a land which is now called Iran and northern Iraq. They called themselves the black-headed (dark- haired) people. We know them as the Aryan/Sumerian, ancestors of Iranians and the land in which they settled as the land of Sumer (Iran Plateau) The ryans/Sumerians established the first recognizable civilization with a workable system of government.
Their other achievements include the invention of wheeled vehicles and the use of written language. The ancient Iranians developed the scientific practice of agriculture; on the arts side, a distinctive style of architecture and a complex religion which is reflected in their literature..."

IRAQ
>From the US Department of Energy http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/cabs/iraq.html
"Iraq holds more than 112 billion barrels of oil - the world's second largest proven reserves. Iraq also contains 110 trillion cubic feet of gas, and is a focal point for regional security issues."

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200103/21/eng20010321_65623.html Iraq's
Proven Oil Reserves Reach 115 Billion Barrels "Iraq has increased its proven oil reserves by three billion barrels to 115 billion barrels despite the crippling embargo imposed on it after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait, according to local newspapers. Oil ministry undersecretary Taha Hammud said that Iraq has increased oil reserves by three billion barrels to 115 billion barrels. He also said that Iraq's oil reserves will continue to increase in the future to reach 300 billion barrels, overrunning Saudi Arabia. Iraq's
reserves are second in the world to Saudi Arabia, which has reserves totalling 261 billion barrels."

Iraq: the cradle of civilization
http://home.achilles.net/~sal/iraq_history.html "In ancient times the land area now known as modern Iraq was almost equivalent to Mesopotamia, the land between the two rivers Tigris and Euphrates. The Mesopotamian plain was called the Fertile Crescent. This region is known as the Cradle of Civilization; it was the birthplace of the varied civilizations that moved us from prehistory to history. An advanced civilization flourished in this
region long before that of Egypt, Greece, and Rome, for it was here in about 4000BC that the Sumerian culture flourished."

BOSTON GLOBE 4/23/2001
TRIUMPHS, TROUBLES SHAPE GENERATIONS
PRESCOTT BUSH PAVED MODERATE PATH FOR SON AND GRANDSON; WOUNDED BY FRIEND'S BETRAYAL, HE PUT HIGH PRICE ON LOYALTY Author: By Michael Kranish, Globe Staff Date: 04/23/2001 Page: A1 Section: National/Foreign AN AMERICAN DYNASTY
"Prescott Bush was surely aghast at a sensational article the New York Herald Tribune splashed on its front page in July 1942. "Hitler's Angel Has 3 Million in US Bank," read the headline above a story reporting that Adolf Hitler's financier had stowed the fortune in Union Banking Corp., possibly to be held for "Nazi bigwigs." Bush knew all about the New York bank:
He was one of its seven directors. If the Nazi tie became known, it would be a potential "embarrassment"...The situation grew more serious when the government seized Union's assets under the Trading with the Enemy Act, the sort of action that could have ruined Bush's political dreams. As it turned out, his involvement wasn't pursued by the press or political opponents during his Senate campaigns a decade later. But the episode may well have been one of the catalysts for a dramatic change in his life. Just as the Union Banking story broke, Bush volunteered to be chairman of United
Service Organizations, putting himself on the national stage for the first time. He
traveled the country raising millions of dollars to help boost the morale of US troops during World War II, enhancing his stature in a way that helped him get elected US senator. A son and grandson would become presidents."

"The Bush family fortune came from the Third Reich." -John Loftus, former US Justice Dept. Nazi War Crimes investigator and President of the Florida Holocaust Museum quoted in the Sarasota Herald-Tribune 11/11/2000 http://www.newscoast.com/headlinesstory2.cfm?ID=35115

Wall Street Journal September 27, 2001
Bin Laden Family Could Profit From a Jump In Defense Spending Due to Ties to U.S. Bank "If the U.S. boosts defense spending in its quest to stop Osama bin Laden's alleged terrorist activities, there may be one unexpected beneficiary: Mr. bin Laden's family. Among its far-flung business interests, the well- heeled Saudi Arabian clan -- which says it is estranged from Osama -- is an investor in a fund established by Carlyle Group, a well-connected Washington merchant bank specializing in buyouts of defense and aerospace companies. Through this investment and its ties to Saudi royalty, the bin Laden family has become acquainted with some of the biggest names in the Republican Party. In recent years, former President Bush, ex-Secretary of State James Baker and ex-Secretary of Defense Frank Carlucci have made the pilgrimage to the bin Laden family's headquarters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Mr. Bush makes speeches on behalf of Carlyle Group and is senior adviser to its Asian Partners fund, while Mr. Baker is its senior counselor. Mr. Carlucci is the group's chairman. Osama is one of more than
50 children of Mohammed bin Laden, who built the family's $5 billion business, Saudi Binladin Group, largely with construction contracts from the Saudi government."

LA Times 1/10/2002
Arms Buildup Enriches Firm Staffed by Big Guns Defense: Ex-president and other elites are behind weapon-boosting Carlyle Group. "WASHINGTON -- Even by Washington standards, the Carlyle Group has some serious clout. President George W. Bush's father works for Carlyle; so does former Defense Secretary Frank C. Carlucci, whose close friend Donald H. Rumsfeld now runs the Pentagon; and so does a stellar cast of retired generals and Cabinet secretaries, including former Secretary of State James A. Baker III. And even by Wall Street standards, the Carlyle Group has some serious money:
$12.5 billion in investments at last count. The Washington-based private equity firm, which advises and invests for wealthy clients and institutions, has shown returns of more than 34% through the last decade, particularly through timely defense and aerospace investments. So when President Bush declared war on terrorism in September, few were better poised than Carlyle to know how and when to make money. On a single day last month, Carlyle earned $237 million selling shares in United Defense Industries, the Army's fifth-largest contractor. The stock offering was well timed: Carlyle officials say they decided to take the company public only after the Sept.
11 attacks. The stock sale cashed in on increased congressional support for hefty defense spending, including one of United Defense's cornerstone weapon programs."

For more on the Bush/Carlyle story see http://www.redherring.com/vc/2002/0111/947.html Carlyle's Way: Making a mint inside "the iron triangle" of defense, government and industry

Feb 4, 2002 Newsweek Periscope DEALS
Neil Bush's Saudi Business Connection "What was Neil Bush doing in Jidda, Saudi Arabia, last week? Officially, the president's youngest brother was a keynote speaker at an international business forum. (Among the main backers of the event: the Saudi Binladin Construction Group...With an audience filled with Saudi royals, Bush talked about the role of "public opinion" in shaping U.S. Mideast policy. But Bush's main purpose wasn't public-relations advice. NEWSWEEK has learned the presidential sibling also had another
agenda: recruiting Middle East investors for an educational-software firm that, industry sources say, may benefit enormously from the new $26.5 billion education bill signed by President George W. Bush. Neil Bush's Austin-based firm, called Ignite, has raised about $18 million since last year, mostly from foreign investors in Japan, Taiwan and the Middle East, said Ignite exec Kenneth Leonard. The company is exploring joint ventures
with computer software firms in Dubai and is seeking contracts with the United Arab Emirates' Ministry of Education and other foreign governments, said Leonard, who has accompanied Bush on three trips to the Mideast since George W became president."

Bush/Bioport and the Anthrax attack
http://www.motherjones.com/magazine/JF02/biodefense.htmlhttp://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/breaking_5.htmlReport: Saudis financed escape of 4,000 Al Qaida to fight Israel

"Every Republican candidate for President since 1936 has been nominated by
the Chase National Bank." -- From ROBERT A. TAFT after his defeat at the
1952 Republican convention . [Chase is owned by the Rockefellers and
finances the Manhattan Institute where Bush and Giuliani got all their
ideas.] http://www.rense.com/general14/theongoing.htm

"At the founding of the United Nations in San Francisco, Nelson Rockefeller
was in the forefront of the struggle to establish not only an American
system of political and economic security but a new world order." New York
Times, November 1975 http://www.rense.com/general14/theongoing.htm

"The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to
fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are
drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of
mankind." President George Bush, 1991
http://www.rense.com/general14/theongoing.htm

Enron and the oil pipeline deal
http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/news/ntc85031.htm "Enron/Uzbek Oil and Gas:
Represented a multinational energy company in connection with its joint
venture to develop an oil and gas deposit in Uzbekistan."
http://www.mbpprojectfinance.com/transactions/s_oilgas.html
http://www.advancenet.net/~k_a/uzbekistan/companies.htm

"UZBEKISTAN - The U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corp. (OPIC) has agreed
to provide $400 million in financing for a joint venture of Uzbekneftegaz
and Enron oil and Gas Co. (Houston) to develop a clutch of gas fields in
Uzbekistan. It is the largest OPIC commitment in Central Asia thus far."
http://www.moles.org/ProjectUnderground/drillbits/0801/96080107.html
"The one serious drawback companies have faced is getting the supplies to
the right market, the energy-hungry Asian Pacific economies. Afghanistan --
the only Central Asian country with very little oil -- is by far the best
route to transport the oil to Asia. Enron, the biggest contributor to the
Bush-Cheney campaign of 2000, conducted the feasibility study for a US $2.5
billion trans-Caspian gas pipeline which is being built under a joint
venture agreement signed in February 1999 between Turkmenistan, Bechtel and
General Electric Capital Services."
http://www.moles.org/ProjectUnderground/drillbits/6_08/1.html

NY Daily News 2/10/2002 New Bush Tie to Enron White House lawyer got 35G
while in Tex. "Yet another White House official has a long history with
Enron. White House counsel Alberto Gonzales, who has been mentioned as a
possible Bush nominee for the Supreme Court, received more than $100,000 in
political contributions from the energy industry in recent years as a
justice on the Texas Supreme Court. Enron and Enron's law firm were
Gonzales' biggest contributors in his 2000 judicial election, giving
$35,450. Gonzales also worked for Enron's law firm from 1982 through 1992."

From:
The Daily Brew: http://www.thedailybrew.com/
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/MAD201A.html "According to Afghan,
Iranian, and Turkish government sources, Hamid Karzai, the interim Prime
Minister of Afghanistan, was a top adviser to the El Segundo,
California-based UNOCAL Corporation which was negotiating with the Taliban
to construct a Central Asia Gas (CentGas) pipeline from Turkmenistan through
western Afghanistan to Pakistan. Karzai, the leader of the southern Afghan
Pashtun Durrani tribe, was a member of the mujaheddin that fought the
Soviets during the 1980s. He was a top contact for the CIA and maintained
close relations with CIA Director William Casey, Vice President George Bush,
and their Pakistani Inter Service Intelligence (ISI) Service interlocutors.
Later, Karzai and a number of his brothers moved to the United States under
the auspices of the CIA. Karzai continued to serve the agency's interests,
as well as those of the Bush Family and their oil friends in negotiating the
CentGas deal, according to Middle East and South Asian sources."

For hundreds of links and documents on the Bush-Rockefeller-Giuliani Nazi
connection and it's relationship to 9/11 see: http://baltech.org/lederman/

May God bless America and may the American people impeach GW Bush and
forever reject the entire Bush crime family.
http://www.vigo-examiner.com/Feb1402d.htm
+ Me ; ۸:۱٤ ‎ق.ظ ; دوشنبه ٢٩ مهر ،۱۳۸۱
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

Protest Calls for Ouster of U.S. Navy From Bahrain

LA Times
October 19, 2002


<< Protest Calls for Ouster of U.S. Navy From Bahrain >>


At the latest in a series of such demonstrations, ralliers say American
military presence puts the Persian Gulf nation's sovereignty at risk.

By Tony Perry, Times Staff Writer



MANAMA, Bahrain -- Chanting "Death to America!" and "Death to Israel!"
protesters here Friday night angrily called for Bahrain's government to oust
the U.S. Navy from the base that serves as its regional headquarters in the
Persian Gulf.

Initiated by the local Islamic political organization, the protest was the
latest in a series of anti-U.S. demonstrations in recent months, including a
rock-throwing march by several thousand people outside the U.S. Embassy in
April that left a teenage protester dead after a skirmish with police. Two
American sailors were beaten by a crowd a month later.

On Friday, more than 500 protesters rallied outside the United Nations
complex along Embassy Row to urge the world body not to support any U.S.
effort to topple Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. With several television
stations broadcasting the protest across the Arab world, speakers called for
the government of this Persian Gulf island nation to withdraw permission for
the U.S. to continue its military presence, which began shortly after World
War II. "No to American Bases in Islamic Bahrain," read one banner.

The U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet is headquartered here, and U.S. and British Royal
Air Force planes use the international airport as a regional hub. Without
the facilities here, the U.S. ability to project military power in the
region would be undercut.

In exchange for use of the base, the U.S. provides security for Bahrain
against Iraq. The U.S. is also helping Bahrain upgrade its military force
with training and equipment.

During the Persian Gulf War, Iraq launched Scud missiles at Bahrain. Still,
the protesters said the U.S. presence here is politically unacceptable and
endangers Bahrain's sovereignty.

"This is the new colonialism," said one protester, Suhyla Safqr, a dentist.
"Americans are the new savages. We have so much anger at them. We will stop
at nothing to stop them if they attack an Arab country."

Arab intellectuals disagree on how a U.S. effort to topple Hussein would
play in the region.

Mohammed Musfir, a political science lecturer, predicted an exponential
growth in anti-U.S. sentiment and protests that could lead to governments
asking the U.S. military to leave the bases it has used for decades.

"You will see demonstrations like never before in the Arab world," Musfir
said. "The anger has built up because of U.S. support for Israel against the
Palestinians. A war with Iraq will make the anger ignite."

But Hassan M. Saleh Ansari, director of the Gulf Studies Center at the
University of Qatar, a regional think tank, said such predictions are
exaggerated. He noted that the same sort of rhetoric was heard before a
U.S.-led coalition forced Iraq to abandon Kuwait in 1991.

"We have heard this before," Ansari said. "If the war is quick, I do not
think the reaction will be severe."

In Bahrain, King Hamed ibn Isa Khalifa has opted to allow street
demonstrations as part of his drive toward opening up the political process.
Under his late father, such demonstrations were banned and political
opponents were sometimes jailed.

Hamed endorsed the U.S. war against the Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan
and ordered the flagship of Bahrain's tiny navy to assist the U.S. in
looking for Osama bin Laden and other terrorist leaders who might attempt to
flee on the high seas.

Although the extent is difficult to gauge, there is sympathy in Bahrain for
the Lebanon-based Hezbollah militant organization. And there are Bahrainis
among the Al Qaeda and Taliban soldiers incarcerated by the U.S. military at
Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, after being captured in Afghanistan.

At Friday's protest, cheers were heard for Hezbollah, and in the back
streets of the souk district in Manama, the capital, there are posters that
attempt to link the shooting deaths of Palestinian children with the spread
of U.S. fast-food franchises in the region.

"The U.S. supports Israel in brutalizing Palestinians and allows it to
ignore U.N. resolutions," said businessman Habib Jamiri, standing in the
crowd at the protest. "America says it wants Saddam out so that Iraq can
have democracy. This is a lie. America wants Iraqi oil and to help the
Israelis."

Iraqi officials have sought to convince regional leaders that any U.S.
attack on Iraq should be seen as an attack on all Islamic countries.
Although the leadership in those countries, including the Bahraini king, has
publicly distanced itself from that idea, the concept seems to have caught
hold among at least a portion of the population.

"First it was Afghanistan, now Iraq, soon Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. America
will not be happy until it destroys all of Islam," said one protester,
Sallah Salih, who works at a Chili's restaurant.

http://www.latimes.com/la-fg-bahrain19oct19,0,720483.story

+ Me ; ٧:٤٥ ‎ق.ظ ; دوشنبه ٢٩ مهر ،۱۳۸۱
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

Killing of Afghan Women and Children

Just see how an american soldier confess that theye were given specific orders to kill Afghan women and children:

To read the complete article you may check:
http://www.theithacajournal.com/news/stories/20020525/topstories/380284.html

Saturday, May 25, 2002
Ithaca Journal
Fresh memories of war
Soldiers prepare for their second mission at the Bagram military base in East Afghanistan.
By KANDEA MOSLEY
Journal Staff


ITHACA -- The stench of decaying flesh hung heavy in the air as soldiers passed blown-up bunkers and caves.

As they moved down an L-shaped corridor, the stiffened limbs of a Taliban soldier jutted from beneath piles of rock and dust in the sweltering afternoon air.

Ripped-up pages from the Koran, and booklets describing ways to kill Americans, littered the tree-lined valley that had been bombarded by U.S. air strikes before their arrival.

These recollections, marking the intensity of every hour of every day felt in combat, typify the memories that resurface for veterans of World War II, Korea, Vietnam, the Gulf War and other military combat this Memorial Day weekend.

For Army Private Matt Guckenheimer, who recently returned home to Tompkins County after two missions in Eastern Afghanistan, processing these memories and readjusting to American life has just begun.

Guckenheimer, who helped clear the L-shaped valley near the border of Pakistan whose twists and turns are burned into his memory, explained the nature of his company's mission. In doing so, he spoke candidly about the reality of war.

In an April interview with The Ithaca Journal at his family's Cayuga Heights home, Guckenheimer, 22, shared his experiences during Operation Anaconda. He was sent on March 6 in a company of more than 100 soldiers to participate in the largest U.S.-led ground engagement in Eastern Afghanistan.

"We were told there were no friendly forces," said Guckenheimer, an assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was anybody there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were women and children to kill them."

Taliban al-Qaida soldiers had already been given about two weeks to surrender when U.S. soldiers were ordered to demolish their last strongholds and finish the operation, he said.

....


+ Me ; ۱٠:۱۱ ‎ق.ظ ; یکشنبه ٢۸ مهر ،۱۳۸۱
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

I'm an American tired of American lies

Woody Harrelson
Thursday October 17, 2002
The Guardian

The man who drives me to and from work is named Woody too. A relief to me,
as it minimises the chance of my forgetting his name. I call him Woodman and
he calls me Wood. He has become my best friend here, even though he's upset
that I have quit drinking beer. He's smart, funny, and there's nothing he
hasn't seen in 33 years behind the wheel of his black cab. He drove me for a
while before I felt confident he liked me; he doesn't like people easily,
especially if they have a rap for busting up black cabs.
Woodman and I agree about a lot of things, but one thing we can never agree
about is Iraq. He thinks the only language Saddam understands is brute
force. I don't believe we should be bombing cities in our quest for one man.
We've killed a million Iraqis since the start of the Gulf war - mostly by
blocking humanitarian aid. Let's stop now. Thankfully, most of the Brits I
talk to about the war are closer to me than to Woodman. Only your prime
minister doesn't seem to have noticed.

I have been here three months doing a play in the West End. I am having the
time of my life. I love England, the people, the parks, the theatre. The
play is great and the audiences have been a dream. Probably I should just
relax, be happy and talk about the weather, but this war is under my skin -
it affects my sleep.

I remember playing basketball with an Iraqi in the late 80s while Iran and
Iraq were at war. I didn't know at the time that the US and Britain were
supplying weapons to both sides. I asked why they were always at war with
each other and he said something that stayed with me: "If it were up to the
people, there would be peace. It's the governments that create war." And now
my government is creating its second war in less than a year. No; war
requires two combatants, so I should say "its second bombing campaign".

I went to the White House when Harvey Weinstein was showing Clinton the
movie Welcome to Sarejevo, which I was in. I got a few moments alone with
Clinton. Saddam throwing out the weapons inspectors was all over the news
and I asked what he was going to do. His answer was very revealing. He said:
"Everybody is telling me to bomb him. All the military are saying, 'You
gotta bomb him.' But if even one innocent person died, I couldn't bear it."
And I looked in his eyes and I believed him. Little did I know he was
blocking humanitarian aid at the time, allowing the deaths of thousands of
innocent people.

I am a father, and no amount of propaganda can convince me that half a
million dead children is acceptable "collateral damage". The fact is that
Saddam Hussein was our boy. The CIA helped him to power, as they did the
Shah of Iran and Noriega and Marcos and the Taliban and countless other
brutal tyrants. The fact is that George Bush Sr continued to supply nerve
gas and technology to Saddam even after he used it on Iran and then the
Kurds in Iraq. While the Amnesty International report listing countless
Saddam atrocities, including gassing and torturing Kurds, was sitting on his
desk, Bush Sr pushed through a $2bn "agricultural" loan and Thatcher gave
hundreds of millions in export credit to Saddam. The elder Bush then had the
audacity to quote the Amnesty reports to garner support for his oil war.

A decade later, Shrub follows the same line: "We have no quarrel with the
Iraqi people." I'm sure half a million Iraqi parents are scratching their
heads over that. I'm an American tired of lies. And with our government,
it's mostly lies.

The history taught in our schools is scandalous. We grew up believing that
Columbus actually discovered America. We still celebrate Columbus Day.
Columbus was after one thing only - gold. As the natives were showering him
with gifts and kindness, he wrote in his diary, "They do not bear arms ...
They have no iron ... With 50 men we could subjugate them all and make them
do whatever we want." Columbus is the perfect symbol of US foreign policy to
this day.

This is a racist and imperialist war. The warmongers who stole the White
House (you call them "hawks", but I would never disparage such a fine bird)
have hijacked a nation's grief and turned it into a perpetual war on any
non-white country they choose to describe as terrorist.

To the men in Washington, the world is just a giant Monopoly board. Oddly
enough, Americans generally know how the government works. The politicians
do everything they can for the people - the people who put them in power.
The giant industries that are polluting our planet as well as violating
human rights worldwide are the ones nearest and dearest to the hearts of
American politicians.

But in wartime people lose their senses. There are flags and yellow ribbons
and posters and every media outlet is beating the war drum and even sensible
people can hear nothing else. In the US, God forbid you should suggest the
war is unjust or that dropping cluster bombs from 30,000ft on a city is a
cowardly act. When TV satirist Bill Maher made some dissenting remarks about
the bombing of Afghanistan, Disney pulled the plug on him. In a country that
lauds its freedom of speech, a word of dissent can cost you your job.

I read in a paper here about a woman who held out the part of her taxes that
would go to the war effort. Something like 17%. I like that idea, though in
the US it would have to be more like 50%. If you consider money as a form of
energy, then we see half our taxes and half the US government's energy
focused on war and weapons of mass destruction. Over the past 30 years, this
amounts to more than ten trillion dollars. Imagine that money going to
preserving rainforest or contributing to a sustainable economy (as opposed
to the dinosaur tit we are currently in the process of sucking dry).

I give in to Woodman, and we stop for a few beers. He asks me what I'd do in
Bush's shoes. Easy: I'd honour Kyoto. Join the world court. I'd stop
subsidising earth rapers like Monsanto, Dupont and Exxon. I'd shut down the
nuclear power plants. So I already have $200bn saved from corporate welfare.
I'd save another $100bn by stopping the war on non-corporate drugs. And I'd
cut the defence budget in half so they'd have to get by on a measly $200bn a
year. I've already saved half a trillion bucks by saying no to polluters and
warmongers.

Then I'd give $300bn back to the taxpayers. I'd take the rest and pay the
people teaching our children what they deserve. I'd put $100bn into
alternative fuels and renewable energy. I'd revive the Chemurgy movement,
which made the farmer the root of the economy, and make paper and fuel from
wheat straw, rice straw and hemp. Not only would I attend, I'd sponsor the
next Earth Summit. And, of course, I'd give myself a fat raise.

Woodman drops me at home and I ask if he likes my ideas. He offers a
reluctant "yes". As he pulls away he yells out, "But I'd never vote for a
man who can't handle a few pints at the end of the day!"

· Woody Harrelson appears in On an Average Day at the Comedy Theatre, Panton
Street, London SW1 until November 3. Box office: 020-7369 1731

+ Me ; ۱۱:٢۱ ‎ق.ظ ; جمعه ٢٦ مهر ،۱۳۸۱
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

Killing the Political Animal

Published on Wednesday, October 16, 2002 by CommonDreams.org
Killing the Political Animal:
CIA Psychological Operations and Us
by Heather Wokusch

Dysfunctional Bush and his anachronistic cronies are leading us right into a catastrophic Middle Eastern blowout. That much is apparent. But what's not so clear is why we're allowing it to happen.

Analyzing Dubya's psychological challenges is not enough - he's the symptom not the cause, and while the rapidity of societal decline has seemed to accelerate since 2000's farcical US presidential election, the framework for rollback was in place long before. If it hadn't been, citizens quite simply wouldn't have tolerated the rigged results.

But what mechanisms could have been used to facilitate the rollback? How can an unwilling population be trained to blindly accept a new, repressive social order?

A CIA instruction manual entitled "Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare" provides some clues. Written in the early 1980s (coincidentally, soon after Bush Sr. headed the Agency) the document was part of the US government's crusade to bring down Nicaragua's leftist government, by providing training and weapons to the Contra rebels. Detailing how to gain a community's support through propaganda and selective violence, the manual begins "In effect, the human being should be considered the priority objective in a political war ... Once his mind has been reached, the 'political animal' has been defeated, without necessarily receiving bullets."

The following are quotes from the original psyop textbook, along with contemporary examples-

PSYOP quote: "It is appropriate ... to guide the discussion of a group to cover a number of points and to reach a correct conclusion." The people "should feel it was their free and own decision."

Interesting to note that up until early 2000, military personnel from the Fourth Psychological Operations Group based in Fort Bragg, North Carolina were active at CNN's Atlanta-based headquarters - and left only after public outcry when CNN admitted to employing them. Their presence was perhaps not surprising given former CIA director William Colby's boast that "the Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any major significance in the major media."

So much for a democratic free flow of information.

Also striking is how the "discussion" around attacking Iraq is being guided "to reach a correct conclusion." After both the House and Senate agreed to give Bush his blank check to attack Iraq (requesting only that Bush report to Congress every 60 days if he does decide to take action) Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle called the endorsement of war "a statement of American values and resolve." Apparently Daschle was unaware of the large anti-war street protests taking place across the country, and the overwhelming number of anti-war phone calls flooding House and Senate offices.

Now that the vote is finished, the media will no doubt bombard with messages echoing Daschle's myopic observation, and assuring the American population the vote for war was their "free and own decision."

PSYOP quote: "Always be prepared with simple slogans in order to explain to the people, whether in intentional form or by chance, the reason for the weapons." Reasons such as: "The weapons will be for winning freedom; they are for you," or "Our weapons are, in truth, the weapons of the people, yours."

The Bush administration proposes to increase its annual military budget by $120 billion (over one third) by 2007, which would bring the total annual budget to $451 billion; this while the economy crumbles and social services get left behind. The justification?

George W. Bush "Nothing is more important than the national security of our country. So nothing is more important than our defense budget. The price for freedom is high, but it's never too high as far as I'm concerned.”

Donald Rumsfeld “The defense budget is cheap when one compares it to putting our security at risk, our lives at risk, our country at risk, our freedom at risk.”

PSYOP quote: "In places and situations wherever possible ... explain the operation of weapons to the youths and young men."

A endless war requires an endless supply of cannon fodder; lucky for the military if enough recruits succumb to the sexy hype about weapons and enlist. If they don't though, there's always the Universal Military Training and Service Act (H.R. 3598) which, aiming to bring back the draft, states: "ALL males residing in the U.S. between the ages of 18-22 (must) receive military training for at least 6 months" and imposes additional time on high school dropouts.

Chew on that quote for a second. The high school dropout part is self-explanatory; longer military sentences would effectively be forced on poor kids and minorities, those most likely to drop out of school. The "residing" part is odd though - apparently, even citizens of other countries who happen to live in the US will be obligated to complete military service for Uncle Sam.

So it appears every trick in the book will be used to get our youth on the battlefield, but once those boys come home wounded or in body bags, they and their families will be abandoned, at least if Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld has his way. Addressing the Armed Services Committee, Rumsfeld recently claimed he had no knowledge of the US having ever shipped any biological weapons to Iraq; Rumsfeld said he had no knowledge despite the existence of substantial proof, including a widely-distributed 1994 Senate Report documenting the US sale of bacteria and viruses to Iraq.

The medical issue becomes even more serious when considering the fact that biological warfare agents don't affect only those service members directly exposed: they can lie undetected and later be transferred to family and friends back home. This is the stuff of epidemics, and the DOD's head-in-the-sand handling of the physical maladies of Gulf War veterans has only exacerbated the danger to us all.

Small wonder that, unlike hawkish politicians who have never seen battle, many Gulf War vets oppose an attack on Iraq. And Rumsfeld had better take notice: the American Gulf War Veterans Association (AGWVA) is so appalled by his claim of ignorance about the weapons sale - and attending denial about the dangers of a new war with Iraq - they've officially called for his resignation.

PSYOP quote: "Established citizens ... will be recruited initially as 'Social Crusaders' in typically 'innocuous' movements in the area of operations. When their 'involvement' with the clandestine organization is revealed to them, this supplies the psychological pressure to use them as 'inside cadres' in groups to which they already belong or of which they can be members."

Operation TIPS, US Attorney General John Ashcroft's plan to enlist citizens in spying on one another is down, but definitely not out. Due to public outcry, postal and utilities workers may have been exempted but employees of "industry associations and groups" in the broadly-defined transportation sector are still being "invited to receive information" on the program. It's anyone's guess who the invitation will be extended to next...

PSYOP quote: "Bring about uprisings or shootings, which will cause the death of one or more persons, who would become the martyrs ... in order to create greater conflicts."

In "Body of Secrets," respected journalist James Bamford explores official government records in which the Pentagon "called for innocent people to be shot on American streets, for boats ... to be sunk on the high seas, for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington D.C., Miami and elsewhere," for "people to be framed for bombings they did not commit" and for planes to be hijacked, all in the name of convincing Congress and the American public to support a new war. Bamford writes about the early 1960s, but many of the Pentagon's proposals then seem uncomfortably reminiscent today.

So whatever happened to the basic foundations of "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness"? Have we really gone so far astray that independent thought is a thing of the past, trampled in the dirt by an artificial psyop reality?

Time to read through those Amendments once again, slowly. Then take a careful look at the insidious ways we're being controlled, and throw off the shackles.

Heather Wokusch is a free-lance writer. She can be contacted via her web site: www.heatherwokusch.com

+ Me ; ۱۱:۱٧ ‎ق.ظ ; جمعه ٢٦ مهر ،۱۳۸۱
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

More facts out on U.S. slaughter in Gulf

In 1992, a documentary film was made by Americans (I am not sure if it was by private companies or US Government) for the anniversary of Iraqi occupation of Kuwait. That film was supposed to be a brief review of all events from the occupation till Iraq's submission after they lost the war to Americans. That film was like most of other war documentaries as you expect with one difference that I can never forget.

In one scene it was showing American soldiers riding an armored bulldozers which were running over live Iraqi soldiers who had raised their hands and white flags as a sign of submission. But still they were being buried alive under sands in their bunkers with no mercy and ignoring all international laws and humanitarian values. Unfortunately I had no VCR at that time to record it and never again they did not broadcast it.

************
More facts out on U.S. slaughter in Gulf

-- from T h e M i l i t a n t -- t h e m i l i t a n t . c o m


More facts out on U.S. slaughter in Gulf
1991 massacre of thousands of fleeing Iraqi troops was part of U.S. 'total war'

"It was like going down an American highway--people were all mixed up in cars in trucks. People got out of their cars and ran away. We shot them.... The Iraqis were getting massacred."--Pfc. Charles Sheehan-Miles, describing March 2, 1991, assault on retreating Iraqi column at Rumaila, Iraq, two days after cease-fire in Gulf War.

"We've blown away a busload of kids."--Unidentified platoon sergeant during March 2 assault.

"We're yelling on the radio, 'They're firing at the prisoners! They're firing at the prisoners!'"--Specialist 4 Edward Walker, describing February 27, 1991, incident during ground invasion of Iraq.

"It's murder."--Unidentified U.S. soldier during February 27 attack.

BY MAURICE WILLIAMS
Washington's assault on Iraq was one of the biggest slaughters in modern history. The six-week bombardment that began in mid-January 1991 and the 100-hour ground invasion unleashed on February 24 killed an estimated 150,000 people. Millions were homeless and exposed to hunger and disease, as large sections of the country were left in ruins. The murderous effects of that war are still felt today, reinforced by the ongoing economic embargo and continued bombing attacks against Iraq.

Despite attempts by the U.S. government to lie and cover up the truth about its massacre, some of the facts have come out over the years.

An extensive article in the May 22 issue of the New Yorker magazine by journalist Seymour Hersh has exposed more facts about Washington's slaughter in the Arab-Persian Gulf.

Washington seized on Baghdad's invasion of Kuwait in August 1990 to launch a war aimed at overthrowing the Iraqi government and installing a regime subservient to U.S. imperialism. In pursuing these goals the U.S. capitalist class sought to gain an edge over its imperialist rivals in Europe and Japan, bolster its domination in the Middle East, and gain greater control over the oil reserves in the Gulf. The U.S. rulers also used the war to tighten their military encirclement of the workers state in Russia.

Washington, however, did not achieve its political aims in the region. They failed to overthrow the Iraqi government. They have proven unable to crush the Palestinian struggle for a homeland. Instead, there is more volatility and instability in the region and today the Israeli government, its junior imperialist partner in the region, has been forced out of Lebanon.

The February 1991 U.S.-led ground invasion of Iraq was a one-sided slaughter, not a war. The capitalist regime in Iraq, headed by Saddam Hussein, did not organize a fight but simply tried to maneuver with Washington. Baghdad abandoned the mass of workers and peasants in Iraq's army on the battlefield of Kuwait and southern Iraq. As these ex-soldiers tried to flee back home, the U.S. military machine simply massacred tens of thousands of human beings. The U.S. invading forces suffered barely a handful of casualties, mostly from "friendly fire."

Hersh is a liberal journalist who gained a reputation for his investigative reporting on the 1968 My Lai massacre of Vietnamese by the U.S. military. For the New Yorker article, more than 300 interviews were conducted with U.S. army officers in the Gulf war and army investigators.

Hersh focuses mainly on events after the cease-fire announced by U.S. president George Bush on Feb. 28, 1991, in particular the operations directed by one of the top commanders of the Gulf War, Gen. Barry McCaffrey. The article quotes U.S. army officers and soldiers who describe several instances of Iraqis being killed as they tried to flee or surrender or even after they had given themselves up as prisoners to the U.S. forces.

Hersh views these massacres simply as an "excess" of war. He doesn't challenge the premise of Washington's bipartisan assault on the Iraqi people, and so doesn't dwell much on the brutality unleashed by Washington before the February 28 cease-fire, which Bush proclaimed because he believed that by then the U.S. forces were on the verge of achieving their goals.

Nonetheless, even the limited facts presented in this article are an indictment of Washington and shed light on the character of its assault.

McCaffrey, who commanded 26,000 troops of the 24th Infantry Division, drove his forces more than 200 miles into Iraq to block the retreat of Iraqi soldiers from the war zone in Kuwait. Abandoned by their military leadership, they offered no resistance.

Killing of hundreds of fleeing soldiers
"We met the enemy," recalled 1st Lt. Greg Downey, describing an encounter on February 25, the second day of the ground war. "They were a sad sight with absolutely no fight left in them." Referring to the fact their leadership had stranded them, he added, "The hate I had for any Iraqi dissipated."

After the cease-fire was declared, the retreating Iraqis had been assured safe passage. Many had thrown away their weapons. Tanks were loaded on trucks with their cannons aimed to the rear. "Some of the tanks were in travel formation, and their guns were not in any engaged position," said Sgt. Stuart Hirstein of the 124th Military Intelligence Battalion.

On March 2, deep inside Iraq, a five-mile-long retreating column of Iraqis approached the causeway across Lake Hammar, near the Rumaila oil field west of Basra. They ran into the U.S. forces McCaffrey had deployed right across the line of retreat. McCaffrey ordered a devastating attack. The U.S. military forces sealed off the causeway with Apache attack helicopters and artillery fire, pinned the Iraqi column on the road, and pounded them for five hours with wave after wave of bomb, tank, artillery, and missile attacks.

At least 400 Iraqis were killed. Some 700 Iraqi tanks, armored cars, and trucks were destroyed. Among them was a bus with civilians and children that was hit by a rocket. No shots were fired at the U.S. forces, and there were no serious U.S. combat casualties.

No reporters were allowed in the area at the time. During the Gulf War no media representatives were permitted on the battlefields without military escorts.

The massacre of unresisting Iraqis and the deaths of children deeply disturbed many U.S. soldiers. One platoon sergeant remarked, "We've blown away a busload of kids."

An officer in the 124th Military Intelligence Battalion said a captured Iraqi tank commander asked his U.S. interrogators several times, "Why are you killing us? All we were doing was going home."

U.S. slaughter of Iraqi prisoners
On February 27, the fourth day of the U.S. ground invasion, a large group of Iraqi soldiers had surrendered to a platoon in the 2-7 Battalion of the 24th Infantry Division. One of the first vehicles to pull up was a bus filled with wounded Iraqi soldiers. The bus was marked with a crescent--the Arab equivalent of the Red Cross sign. Doctors and male nurses were among the approximately 380 prisoners.

Specialist 4 Edward Walker was ordered to blow up weapons confiscated from the Iraqi soldiers. Shortly after destroying a truck holding these weapons, the platoon was abruptly ordered to move on. The U.S. GIs, greatly outnumbered by the Iraqis, left after giving them surrender leaflets printed in Arabic. The papers promised that those who gave up would live to see their families again. Lt. Kirk Allen, the platoon commander, notified the battalion's operations headquarters of the exact location of the Iraqi hospital bus.

As the confiscated weapons were destroyed in a massive explosion, according to Walker, several U.S. Bradley vehicles, armed with chain-driven machine guns capable of firing up to a thousand rounds a minute, rolled onto the scene. The high-intensity weapons opened up.

'They knew there were prisoners there'
Walker, who was convinced all the prisoners were mowed down, said the Bradleys also fired on him and the other GIs who were in a marked Humvee. "They knew there were prisoners there. They knew they were unarmed," said Walker. "They knew the hospital bus was there, and they knew we were blowing the truck up."

Walker left the military in 1991, not permitted by the authorities at Fort Leonard Wood to reenlist after spilling the beans on the killing.

Another military engagement involving McCaffrey's troops from the 124th Military Intelligence Battalion occurred one day after the cease-fire. A ground-radar surveillance team joined a platoon of scouts who discovered a cache of Iraqi weapons at a deserted schoolhouse near Highway 8.

Steven Larimore, a sergeant who headed a brigade assigned to the platoon, said his men noticed a group of villagers walking in the area. "One guy had a white bedsheet on a stick," Larimore stated. "Out of the blue sky, some guy from where we're sitting begins shooting" at the Iraqis. Other machine guns opened fire. In less than three or four minutes some 20 Iraqi civilians were mowed down.

Liberal reporter Hersh denounces the U.S.-organized atrocities carried out after the cease-fire under McCaffrey's command, but says little about the brutal bombing campaign and the final ground assault by the U.S. forces until then--a war that was completely bipartisan.

But the events of March 2 were a continuation of the "total war" approach unleashed by the imperialist rulers on the Iraqi people, culminating with the annihilation of tens of thousands fleeing on the highway from Kuwait City to Basra.

During this onslaught, described by pilots as a "turkey shoot," U.S. military forces bombed the front and back of Iraqi convoys, trapping thousands of vehicles in a "killing box." A reporter for the London Independent who visited the scene of the carnage wrote, "I lost count of the Iraqi corpses crammed into the smouldering wreckage or slumped face down in the sand."

Far from being a rogue officer, McCaffrey simply carried out the "Powell doctrine"--named for Colin Powell, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time--of using maximum force at the outset of a war to minimize U.S. casualties.

"Do we understand that when we use military force decisively, we are actually killing people and breaking up their equipment?" McCaffrey insisted in an interview published in the May 29 issue of Newsweek. "Do you understand that when you actually apply power, you don't want a fair fight?"

One fact Hersh does not report is that during the murderous Desert Storm assault, the U.S. army literally buried alive thousands of Iraqi soldiers in their trenches.

On February 24-25, 1991, three U.S. army brigades used tanks equipped with plows to fill in with sand 70 miles of six-foot-deep trenches defended by more than 8,000 Iraqi soldiers on the Saudi-Iraq border.

McCaffrey came under investigation after the war when an officer in his unit filed a complaint about his post-cease-fire operations. Military investigators filed a secret report and exonerated McCaffrey in 1991.

McCaffrey was promoted to four-star general in 1994 and served as commander of the U.S. military forces in Latin America. President William Clinton named him White House "drug czar" two years later. Today he is directly involved in Washington's escalating military intervention in Colombia, which is being waged under the banner of fighting drug traffickers intertwined with the "fight against terrorism."

The U.S.-organized massacre in Iraq was not an aberration or an excess. It was the product of the drive by the U.S. ruling families to defend their declining capitalist world order. The Gulf War announced subsequent military assaults like the U.S.-led war against Yugoslavia.

One of the best explanations of these developments can be found in New International no. 7, which features the article "Opening Guns of World War III: Washington's Assault on Iraq," by Jack Barnes.
+ Me ; ٧:٠۳ ‎ق.ظ ; یکشنبه ٢۱ مهر ،۱۳۸۱
    پيام هاي ديگران ()   

House Slave

Singer Belafonte Likens Powell to 'House Slave'
Wed Oct 9, 5:06 PM ET
By Steve Gorman

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Singer Harry Belafonte (news) lashed out at Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) in a racially charged radio interview, likening the former general to a plantation slave who had sold out his principles "to come into the house of the master."

Belafonte, 75, who has long been outspoken on civil rights and other political issues, leveled his criticism at Powell during an appearance on Tuesday on a morning talk show airing on AM station KFMB in San Diego.

A partial transcript of his remarks, and a link to a recording of the interview, were posted Wednesday on the radio station's Web site (http://www.760kfmb.com).

The entertainer, who like Powell is a black man of Jamaican descent, criticized the secretary when asked by radio host Ted Leitner whether he thought Powell had taken a low profile as the Bush administration pressed its case against Iraqi ruler Saddam Hussein (news - web sites). Powell initially had been seen as a leading proponent in the administration for seeking U.N. support for any military force against Iraq as opposed to unilateral action by the United States.

"There's an old saying, in the days of slavery, there were those slaves who lived on the plantation and were those slaves that lived in the house," Belafonte said. "You got the privilege of living in the house if you served the master ... exactly the way the master intended to have you serve him.

"Colin Powell's committed to come into the house of the master," the performer continued. "When Colin Powell dares to suggest something other than what the master wants to hear, he will be turned back out to pasture."

Belafonte went on to suggest that Powell's presence in the Bush cabinet amounted to racial tokenism, saying, "What Colin Powell serves is to give the illusion that the Bush cabinet is a diverse cabinet, made up of people of color ... when in fact none of that is what is true."

Belafonte, who popularized calypso music with such 1950s hits as "Banana Boat (Day-O)" and "Jamaica Farewell," also repeated his criticism of Powell and the Bush administration for not attending an international conference on racism in South Africa.

In Washington, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher told reporters that Powell "smiled" when he heard of Belafonte's remarks.

"He also said that both the IRS and his accountants thought he was better off as a field hand," Boucher said, adding that Powell had no other particular comment. The State Department has not tried to contact Belafonte, he said.

Leitner, a local sportscaster who hosts his morning talk show on KFMB each weekday, told Reuters that Belafonte was in San Diego for a performance there on Saturday.

Leitner said he was struck by the bluntness of Belafonte's remarks.

"People have become so politically correct," Leitner said. "Even on talk radio nowadays, for someone to come out, an African American, to go after Colin Powell like that ... was so unusual in this day and age that it really stood out."

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=765&u=/nm/20021009/people_nm/politics_belafonte_dc&printer=1
+ Me ; ٧:۳۸ ‎ق.ظ ; پنجشنبه ۱۸ مهر ،۱۳۸۱
    پيام هاي ديگران ()